RE: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache DataLab (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

On 2023/02/28 01:38:02 Justin Mclean wrote: > 5. I've reviewed the name discussion [1] and logo [2] (links are added). > In my opinion, the logo demonstrates the podling name: DataLab (logo) & Data Lab (podling name). > I was wondering if you could explain why our logo doesn't reflect the

RE: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache NuttX to TLP

I have reviewed the current trademark status and I am happy to proceed on the basis that the transfer will be started after graduation. Mark Mark Thomas VP, Brand Management On 2022/11/07 13:13:03 Willem Jiang wrote: Sorry, I need to change my vote to -1. I just discovered a brand issue we

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, Can someone explain to me what branding issues on the Presto website have to do with the graduation of Apache Pinot? Separately, I will note that this page: https://prestodb.io/docs/current/connector.html referenced earlier in this thread still has a large number of issues.

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Thomas updated INCUBATOR-245: -- Attachment: (was: 2021_01_10_07_45_25.mp4) > Slider - Auditing Capabil

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Dubbo graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

+1 (binding) Mark On 01/05/2019 02:44, Huxing Zhang wrote: > Hi All, > > After discussion in the Apache Dubbo community on the dev mailing > list[1], choosing PMC chair[2], forming the PMC members[3], completing > the maturity model[4], discussing the resolution proposal[5], and > voting for

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.7.1 [RC1]

On 22/03/2019 09:09, Ian Luo wrote: > Please vote accordingly: > [X] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason - GPG signatures are correct - SAH512 hashes are correct - Builds successfully from src distro Comment only (no action required): - Tag includes Maven wrapper

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

On 19/03/2019 05:42, Antoine Toulme wrote: All, the results are in, from VP Legal: Nitpick. VP, Brand Management rather than VP, Legal. Mark I am happy to approve the name in isolation. Specifically, the community must refrain from linking the project to any Star Wars references. The view

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.6 [RC2]

On 06/03/2019 08:24, Huxing Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:50 AM Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 04/03/2019 11:34, Minxuan Zhuang wrote: >>> Hello Incubator Community, >>> >>> The Apache Dubbo community has voted on and approved a

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.6 [RC2]

On 04/03/2019 11:34, Minxuan Zhuang wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache Dubbo community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Dubbo (Incubating) version 2.6.6. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator release. > >

Re: Withdraw from Incubator or TLP status?

On 05/03/2019 14:09, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:27 AM Justin Mclean wrote: >> ...An Apache project can be retired to the Attic. [1] After this development >> could possibly occur elsewhere, >> but there may be naming and trademark issues to consider > >

Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

On 25/02/2019 19:22, Dave Fisher wrote: To me the main Incubator problem is most podlings do not have three fully engaged mentors. +1 52 or 53 Incubating podlings may be too many. +1 The Incubator may be too lenient in (a) allowing podlings in with minimal mentors +1 The tricky

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

On 25/02/2019 14:15, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:35 AM Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 23/02/2019 06:18, Willem Jiang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just have a question about the Binary jars in the source release. >>> Accordin

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

On 23/02/2019 06:18, Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi, > > I just have a question about the Binary jars in the source release. > According the Apache release policy, I cannot find any rule about the > binary jars cannot be in the source release[1]. If we just have jars > for testing purposes and those

Re: Fwd: [DISCUSS] can we use weex.io as the short domain namefortheapache project

All, ASF policy states that: "Apache projects must host official website content on an apache.org domain" That said, if there are issues with access speeds from some locations I'd strongly urge affected projects to engage with our infrastructure team to find a solution. Maybe we can set up a

Fwd: Release Apache Dubbo OPS(Incubating) 0.1[RC3]

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Release Apache Dubbo OPS(Incubating) 0.1[RC3] Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:10:10 + From: Mark Thomas Reply-To: d...@dubbo.apache.org To: d...@dubbo.apache.org On 03/02/2019 03:52, Minxuan Zhuang wrote: > Please vote accordingly: > &g

Re: Draft incubator report

On 05/02/2019 10:23, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> We need a formulation which enables pre-release QA by non-coding >> contributors. I've given my attempt at formulating it. Please give your >> take on how to accomplish this. > > As long as these are not available to the general public all

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Unomi to TLP

On 22/01/2019 00:37, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> -0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name >> search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not >> in the Maturity model and I’m not sure why.

Re: Official releases vs unreleased code

On 07/01/2019 12:05, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > So, just to be clear what this means in the context of Apache NetBeans. > > Here's two different scenarios that relate to this: > > 1. CoolBeans (coolbeans.xyz) is a distribution of Apache NetBeans, with the > difference that it includes the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Airflow to TLP

Sorry to be the bringer of bad news but there is a resolution to terminate a project on this month's board agenda so you'll be (if nothing else changes) the 199th active project. Mark On 06/12/2018 07:33, Bolke de Bruin wrote: Oh nice :-) something for the press release I guess  Op do 6

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing requirements for IPMC

On 30/11/2018 06:04, Makoto Yui wrote: > Justin, > > I think it's a great idea. Podling project leads know the up-to-date > ASF incubation process very well. Apache projects (and podlings) don't have project leads. > It helps finding active mentors. > > As a release manager and PPMC of an

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.5 [RC1]

On 19/11/2018 08:34, victory wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) version 2.6.5. > > The Apache Dubbo community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Dubbo (Incubating) version 2.6.5. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC

Re: [VOTE] Retire ODF Toolkit

On 16/11/2018 19:54, Dave Fisher wrote: > [X] +1 - Retire ODF Toolkit. > [ ] -1 - Do not retire ODF Toolkit. I intend to become a Mentor and try to > make the community happen. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

On 13/11/2018 20:49, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Personally, given the amount of binary releases that are distributed off of > our very own infrastructure (and I'm not even counting our namespace > on things like Docker hub -- I'm just talking about the INFRA we run) I don't > think that the

Re: Approaching Apache's 200th top level project and more than 300 projects have gone through the incubator

On 02/11/2018 22:48, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like the next project to graduate after Griffin will be the ASF’s > 200th top level project! Assuming no other projects get moved to the attic and there are a couple heading in that direction ;) Mark > > We’ll also recently passed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.4 [RC1]

+1 binding The sha512 hash is missing the '*' marker to indicate that this is a binary file. Minor issue but one that was present on the previous release and should have been fixed by now. I also see the minor issue with the work directory structure. Not a show stopper. Builds successfully from

Re: Auto-cleaning up Stale PRs

On 12/09/18 19:16, Sid Anand wrote: > A stale PR is defined by a policy -- for example, 60 days without any > movement on the PR. Automatically closing such issues is not going to do anything to aid community building and is likely to actively damage such efforts. > Stale PRs would be bad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.3 [RC5]

On 03/09/18 03:32, Jun Liu wrote: > Please vote accordingly: > [X] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason Notes: == Hash and signature match. Source zip matches Git tag (apart from expected differences of .gitignore and Maven wrapper) Builds and all tests

Re: Graduation Resolutions Should Not Include Project Bylaws Clause

On 03/09/18 05:53, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > >> On Sep 3, 2018, at 12:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> Personally, I'd prefer that the concept of project bylaws disappear. Move >> to "community guides". A *guide* rather than a *ruleset*. The Board has >> kinda gone quiet on the discussion, but

Re: Poddlings length of time in the incubator

On 26/08/18 02:30, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I’ve discussed this some on the ODF toolkit dev list. Development was >> recently moved to Git. The Incubator needs to decide if we will turnover the >> domains that were donated in 2011 by IBM(?) to the only consistent >> developer. If that

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.3 [RC3]

On 12/08/18 08:12, Jun Liu wrote: > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [X] -1 disapprove with the reason (binding) The sha512 hashes are missing the '*' marker that indicates they are hashes for binary files rather than text files. Trivial issue. Can be addressed

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.2 [RC2]

Checks: Source bundle: - Hash and signature are correct - Hash of tag matches the hash quoted in the release vote mail - Contents of git tag match src bundle except for .gitignore file - Maven build passes - LICENSE and NOTICE look correct for source bundle - LICENSE and NOTICE look correct for

Re: Review mailing list membership?

On 18/04/18 01:47, Gian Merlino wrote: > Thanks Taylor! > > Do you know if this is something that the PPMCs are supposed to have access > to or should we be asking you for help if we want to check again? The best solution would be for other members of the community to volunteer to moderate the

Re: [DISCUSS] Absent mentors

On 01/04/18 21:26, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:15 PM, Shane Curcuru > > wrote: >> >> Jim Jagielski wrote on 4/1/18 10:19 AM: >>> Would it be possible to generate a short list of all current >>> mentors for all current podlings

Re: Self Serve & IPMC Members

On 12/03/18 18:36, Chris Lambertus wrote: > > >> On Mar 12, 2018, at 6:23 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com >> <mailto:gst...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org >> <mailto:ma...@apache.org

Re: Self Serve & IPMC Members

On 09/03/18 21:47, Chris Lambertus wrote: > > >> On Mar 9, 2018, at 1:35 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On 09/03/18 21:11, Chris Lambertus wrote: >>> I am specifically referring to the creation of git repos with my reply, >>>

Re: Self Serve & IPMC Members

On 09/03/18 21:11, Chris Lambertus wrote: > I am specifically referring to the creation of git repos with my reply, > nothing else. You are correct in that the other selfserve.a.o tools for > Jira, Confluence, lists, etc., are pmc-chairs, root, and secretary only. > We will try and be more

Re: Podling setup

On 09/03/18 08:42, Julian Hyde wrote: > I saw the mentor’s guide, went to selfserve as it suggested, and selfserve > would not let me log in. (It still won’t.) So, the line "Most of the > resources you will request can be done via Self Service.” is not true. > > Thanks for fixing LDAP. No

Re: Podling setup

On 09/03/18 07:47, Julian Hyde wrote: > > >> On Mar 8, 2018, at 4:51 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On 07/03/18 23:24, Julian Hyde wrote: >>> I’m a mentor of a new podling, Druid. I would like to help them get set up, >>> e.g.

Re: Podling setup

On 07/03/18 23:24, Julian Hyde wrote: > I’m a mentor of a new podling, Druid. I would like to help them get set up, > e.g. create mailing lists, create git repos. I tried to use > https://selfserve.apache.org/ for these, but > it only allows officers (i.e. PMC

Re: Wiki conflict for March report

On 07/03/18 01:55, John D. Ament wrote: > Thanks Mark. I went through the changes from when the conflict was > introduced to now, I don't see anything missing. I also privately pinged > the culprit. Thanks for the double check. Mark > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:34 PM

Wiki conflict for March report

All, I have just spent rather longer than I would have liked cleaning up a conflicted edit in this month's report. I have two requests. 1. If you have submitted your report, please check I didn't accidentally remove content. I tried hard not to but the report was a mess and something might have

Write access to incubator wiki

Hi, Please grant 'markt' write access to the incubator wiki. Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Thoughts on Trademarks / Existing Domains on Podling Proposals / Reports

On 12/02/18 23:24, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > I think that the Incubator should adjust the proposal process when a project > comes in that has registered trademarks. > > There are a few impacts to consider some of which may need to be private. > > (1) PODLINGNAMESEARCH may not be needed.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Dubbo into the Apache Incubator

On 09/02/18 02:09, Huxing Zhang wrote: > Hi All, > > After some discussion on the Dubbo proposal, I'd like to start a > vote on accepting Dubbo into the Apache Incubator. > >

Re: New name for our incubator project

On 07/02/18 14:37, Joo Yeon Kim wrote: > Hello. > > We have been recently accepted as an incubator project: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CoralProposal > > However, the name "Coral" has been flagged by another project, > and we are in the process of choosing another name. > > We have a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 03/02/18 11:44, Huxing Zhang wrote: > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal > > Dubbo is a high-performance, lightweight, Java based RPC framework. > Dubbo offers three key

Re: [VOTE] Retire iota

On 04/02/18 22:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Iota podling. > > The podling has discussed retirement [1], has not made a single release and > there's been little activity on it’s mailing list [2] and repos [3] in recent > time. > > [ ] +1

Re: question about including website source in release

On 18/01/18 20:43, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if this is already answered somewhere but I couldn't find the > information. The source code that generates the Apache DataFu website > content [1] is currently included in the source code release. However the > source code for the website

Re: Leave me alone

FYI: I have unsubscribed this user using my infra karma. Mark On 30/08/17 03:11, $recordS9090 wrote: > > > kacie karo > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On 07/06/17 17:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> On 2017-06-06 11:59 (-0500), Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: While these are

Re: Images in source code.

On 02/06/2017 22:20, James Bognar wrote: > Thanks! > > I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a > LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. That is more than is necessary. It might even cause confusion at some point in the future. I would recommend

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

On 04/11/2016 13:36, Anthony Baker wrote: > Thanks, updated with notes on RE50. Excellent. Tx. Mark > > Anthony > >> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Maturity assessment: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+Assessment I'd like to see this updated to use the latest version of the maturity model. Mark

Re: [Proposal] Move Wiki Access Requests somewhere

On 05/10/2016 17:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I think it's important that non-Apache folks have an easy way to edit > their proposal as there will typically be changes suggested after they > post it here; having the proposal editing "Apache only" would not be > too good for newcomers although

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

On 20/08/2016 20:59, Mark Thomas wrote: > 3. Identify somewhere to put all the good suggestions for, and links to >examples of, smooth release processes and then pull all the links >and suggestions from this thread to that place. I have a vague >recollection of seeing

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

On 20/08/2016 20:59, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > It seems there is general consensus that this is a good idea. I'm > therefore going to do the following. > > 1. Draft some text to add to >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#releases >and brin

Re: ASF Android release policy

On 13/09/2016 13:38, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Finally, Infra does also provide access to a code signing service you >> can use to sign you apps if that is useful. Probably only if you want to &g

Re: ASF Android release policy

On 13/09/2016 09:49, Ian Dunlop wrote: > Hello, > > In the Taverna Incubator project we have been developing an Android mobile > app which is almost ready for a first release. Are there any ASF procedures > and policies for doing an Android release? Can an ASF based Android app be > released into

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

On 02/09/2016 17:41, Sam Ruby wrote: > To prepare, we will need to decide who gets to modify these lists, and > who gets notified. I propose that members of podlings be able to modify > the list, and the private list associated with that podling be notified > on changes. Alternate choices would

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

>>> From: Shane Curcuru [mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org] >>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 07:08 >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria >>> >>> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 8/19/16 5:

Ease of release process and exit criteria

Hi, I've noticed a pattern in some the board reports of PMCs who are beginning to experience difficulties. In a notable number of cases a significant part of the problem is difficulty in producing a release. The sorts of phrases I am seeing are along the lines of releases "are too difficult",

Re: Code signing and WOT for releases

On 26/07/2016 08:19, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Hi all, > > the docs about release management for incubating projects make clear > that the release needs to be signed[1] and in the end associated with > the project AND the WOT of Apache in general[2]. > > Is there some way to check what the

Re: [VOTE] Accept

On 13/06/2016 21:22, james pruett wrote: > please remove me from this list. Done. Given this was your second unsubscribe request for an ASF list today, I checked all our lists for your address and our records show that this address is not subscribed to any other ASF lists. Kind regards, Mark

Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (HAWQ-694) 1844-313-4857 Quickbooks payroll support usa/canada

On 21/04/2016 21:40, Gregory Chase wrote: > Seems we have a JIRA user who's spamming Apache HAWQ? Is this a compromised > account, or someone who has access that shouldn't? It is a public Jira instance on which anyone can create an account. Sometimes spam happens. It is the cost of an open

Re: Non-voted Release Candidate binary downloadable from project homepage possible?

On 30/12/2015 14:55, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hello, > > We at project FreeMarker intend to issue a Release Candidate under > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/. Note that it's just > "dev", not "release". There will be both source and binary RC release > artifacts. As I understand,

Re: Possible process improvement?

On 14/10/2015 21:07, Dave Birdsall wrote: > Now, the iCLA form itself asks for the preferred apache ID. But that form > does not ask about forwarding e-mail ID. Too, the receipt of the iCLA is > forwarded to the podling’s private list, but not the iCLA itself. The CLA form [1] includes e-mail

Re: Require projects to have solid API docs

On 11/10/2015 16:59, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: > In the future, could Apache Incubator require projects to maintain better > API documentation before graduation? In particular, Kafka has rather sparse > documentation in v0.8. The Javadocs appear to be randomly hosted on this or > that professor

Re: Advice on LICENSE/NOTICE for Shaded Dependencies

On 09/10/2015 19:12, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Hello all, > > I feel like I'm on the verge of getting LICENSE/NOTICE right in all > respects in The TinkerPop. . Seems like there's one piece that's out of > place and could use some advice as I wasn't able to map anything I'd read > in the Apache

Re: apache binary distributions

On 22/08/2015 04:37, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Cool. I can't find info on how much it costs ASF, any pointers before embarking on 100+ artifact signing spree... ;-) With my infra hat on... The short answer is 'Don't worry about it and get signing.' The longer answer is that if a project wants to

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

want to ask Mark Thomas what exactly is involved in preparing and doing such an import. Our own timelines for Maven's switch may not align with the Groovy incubation timelines... (mind you we are all at the grace of Ben for getting our timeline for the second export he committed to the Maven

Javadoc published through archive.apache.org

Incubator community, While reviewing the ASF's public web sites for Javadoc vulnerable to CVE-2013-1571 the ASF infrastructre team discovered the following copies of documentation being published via archive.apache.org: archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/sanselan/0.97/javadoc

Javadoc published through archive.apache.org

UIMA community, While reviewing the ASF's public web sites for Javadoc vulnerable to CVE-2013-1571 the ASF infrastructre team discovered the following copies of documentation being published via archive.apache.org: archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/uima/docs These have been removed from the

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: +infra Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the other. Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer the question? Question: how do we go