-1
I do not think that accepting this podling is in the best interest
of the ASF. Absent explicit criteria / principles governing what
we accept into the Incubator, I have to apply informal judgment here
and I am voting -1 for the following reasons:
0) I think the ASF has a responsibility to
On 6/5/11 11:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/6/2011 12:47 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/5/11 10:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
ASF members wish to devote considerable time and energy to this
project, so exactly who the hell are you to decide what they should
and shouldn't devote
On 6/5/11 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/6/2011 1:06 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/5/11 10:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Wow. Did it occur to you that the original project, Apache httpd
On 6/5/11 11:21 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried to follow as much as emails as possible but it's
overwhelming. Anyway I feel that several questions do not longer
belong to the pre-incubation
On 6/5/11 3:51 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/5/11 11:21 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried to follow as much as emails
On 6/5/11 10:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/5/2011 11:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Agreed. I wish I had a clearer idea of what constitutes a good
reason to reject an incubator proposal on principle, though - even
just a good enough reason to reject this one. As long as there is
some
On 4/8/11 7:06 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I don't recall the Commons PMC saying the project needs to be renamed when it
voted to sponsor this project. If that is necessary I'm sure they will let
the project know.
We voted to sponsor OGNL. Martin is right that our policy is to
avoid the cutesy
On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Bertrand,
I agree. The good thing about a vibrant community is that they
generally enforce this. All I'm saying is this shouldn't be a must
requirement, rather it should be a shall and we can let the individual
communities work out what exceptions
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 5:22:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 1:30:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 3:10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
The Sanselan podling [1] has been incubating since 2007 and has
achieved most of the goals in incubation:
Code has been released [2] according to the incubator release guidelines
Status is up to date [3]
Community mailing lists are responded to promptly [5]
JIRA
This vote has passed.
Incubator PMC (binding)
8 +1 votes (martinc, mvdb, pzf, jukka, brett, rdonkin, leosimons, clr)
no - votes
5 +1 non-binding votes, no non-binding - votes
I will start the process of making infrastructure requests and clearing IP.
Thanks!
Phil
project
* Project Name: JRS
* Project Key: JRS
Initial set of committers
---
* Brendan McCarthy (brendan_dot_mccarthy_at_ gorillalogic_dot_com)
* Tony Ambrozie (tony_dot_a_dot_ambrozie_at_aexp_dot_com)
* Phil Steitz (psteitz_at_apache_dot_org)
* Ian Gray
gorillalogic_dot_com)
* Tony Ambrozie (tony_dot_a_dot_ambrozie_at_aexp_dot_com)
* Phil Steitz (psteitz_at_apache_dot_org)
* Ian Gray (ian_dot_d_dot_gray_at_aexp_dot_com)
* Rahul Akolkar (rahul_at_apache_dot_org)
* Sebastian Bazley (sebb_at_apache_dot_org)
* Martin van den Bemt
On 6/24/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool.
Interesting proposal. Seems useful.
Documentation
-
Documentation is available
On 6/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What have others done to workaround the bootstrapping problem for code
that is currently internally licensed / restricted distribution before
the proposal is accepted and a grant can be executed?
My understanding is that whether projects
On 6/24/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of well,
there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s
inside that we want to clean up first and need time?
We have clearance to execute a code grant
On 3/21/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/19/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If these are indeed going to be official releases, we should totally
dispense with the requirements for -incubating in artifact
On 12/26/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Synapse incubator is therefore asking the Incubator PMC to graduate
the
Synapse project into the Apache Web Services PMC. Synapse heavily
integrates with other WS projects including Axis2, Axiom, Sandesha,
Rampart.
Please send in your
I would like to join the Incubator PMC. I am an ASF member and,
pending a positive acceptance vote, will be serving as a mentor for
the new River project.
Thanks!
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+1
Phil
On 12/20/06, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
non-binding.
Cheers
Niclas
The Jakarta Commons community has voted to accept a donation from Luc
Maisonoble of the Mantissa math library, for inclusion in Jakarta
Commons Math.
The IP clearance form is checked into /ip-clearance as
jakarta-commons-mantissa.xml.
The source is here:
On 6/23/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Being there in real time is also difficult.
This effectively cuts out a lot of people. For partly selfish
reasons, I would hate to see apache projects trend toward more
synchronous communications requirements.
That is why the
On 6/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:15:38AM -0400, Jim Hurley wrote:
Let the records show that Geir is listed as initial committer too yet probably
doesn't work at sun, unless he switched companies again :)
Hey, it's been 6
On 6/22/06, Mark Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 19:19, Leo Simons wrote:
What I'm missing is an idea of the interaction between jini.org and this
proposed new apache project, and an idea of the interaction between the JCP
process and the
+1 (as in will help).
From the text below and the comments in
http://archives.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0604L=jini-usersF=S=P=4029,
I assume that the scope of the project will just be the core
infrastructure. But you also mention related utilities and tools.
Can you clarify a little more
Dittert, Eric wrote:
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,
August 08, 2005 6:40 PM
As I said, it is about balance. The community that we most care
about during Incubation is the developer community, not the
end-user community. I could go so far as to say that a bit of
+1
Phil
Granqvist, Hans wrote:
Proposal
This is a proposal to submit the Trust Services Integration
Toolkit (TSIK) to ASF. TSIK is a Java toolkit that VeriSign
has been developing since 2001, and it is the basis of several
products developed by VeriSign.
The intent with Apache
[ X] Graduate the Directory Project
[ ] Abstain
[ ] Keep incubating the Directory Project
--Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The vote on directory-dev to release a technology preview release of
directory-naming 0.8 from the incubator has passed, with 6 +1 votes
(Phil Steitz, Enrique Rodriguez, Brett Porter, Alex Karasulu, Stephen
McConnell, Vince Tence) and one +0 (Niclas Hedhman). The full vote
thread is here
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyFacesProposal
[X] Accept MyFaces into the Incubator
One small comment: since Wiki pages can change at any time, in the future
it might be best to have votes reference static html (or inlined)
proposals instead of wiki pages. The +1
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Committers could be given commit access long before having project
member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
a lower bar for committing.
Is this
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am not on the Incubator PMC, but I feel that a project still bearing
incubator status should not be permitted to make a Release.
I do not know what exactly you define as a release. Is that more than
a distribution?
An incubator project is
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We should ask ourselves if we expect to provide a home for extended
Perl, C or whatever APIs, naming services for those languages, etc. If
the answer is yes, then fine, we can all agree and move forward.
my opinion is that standards-based Directory + Identity services
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Phil:
Greg posted a message back on the 18th noting that a PMC vote on the
entry of the project to the incubator would be kicked off under the
private [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I don't know the specifics of Incubator
voting policies but I guessing we will see a vote
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Greg posted a message back on the 18th noting that a PMC vote on the
entry of the project to the incubator would be kicked off under the
private [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I don't know the specifics of Incubator
voting policies but I guessing we will see a vote result early
37 matches
Mail list logo
