Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.4.0-rc.1

2022-03-30 Thread Zhaofeng Chen
+1 (binding) I checked - Include the word incubating in the release filename - LICENSE and NOTICE files exist - DISCLAIMER file exist - Build successfully by following the instruction Best, Zhaofeng On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 3:09 PM Mingshen Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > I am pleased to be calling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) v0.2.0-rc.2

2022-03-30 Thread Zhaofeng Chen
+1 (binding) I checked - LICENSE and NOTICE files exist - DISCLAIMER file exist - Include the word incubating in the release filename - No unexpected binary files - Build successfully by following the instruction Best, Zhaofeng On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:58 PM Yuan Zhuang wrote: > Dear

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) v0.2.0-rc.1 (with the correct KEYS link)

2021-11-29 Thread Zhaofeng Chen
+1 I have done the following checks. - DISCLAIMER is OK. - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK. - Code compiled successfully, despite some warnings on unused variables. - All test cases passed. Best, Zhaofeng On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:57 AM Mingshen Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > I am pleased to be calling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) v0.1.0-rc1

2021-06-07 Thread Zhaofeng Chen
+1. I checked - Signatures and hashes are good. - Sources compiled successfully according to the doc. - All test cases are passed. Best, Zhaofeng On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:16 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding, but only due to WIP disclaimer. The license issue, file header > and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.1.0-rc2

2020-10-06 Thread Zhaofeng Chen
+1 (binding) I checked: - Checksums - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - except for some C header files - No unexpected binary files - could be improved in future releases - Code compiles in both SIM and HW mode - Tests pass in both SIM and HW mode 1. Please note