Hi all,
Thanks to everyone who participated in the vote.
The voting is now closed and it has passed with 8 binding +1, 12
non-binding +1, and no 0
or -1 bindings votes. two -1 non-binding votes are answered.
+1 bindings:
Thomas Weise
Ted Liu
tison
Justin Mclean
Willem Jiang
Duo Zhang
Junping Du
t; > > >
> > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project!
> > > > >
> > > > > Bes
nding)
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project!
> > > >
> > > > Best of luck with the project!
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > >
,
> > > >
> > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like
> to
> > > call
> > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check
> out
> > > the
> > > > StreamPark Proposal from the
with the project!
> >
> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> > call
> > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please che
p on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
> the
> > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1, bring
+1 (binding)
Thank you for kicking off this interesting project!
Best of luck with the project!
On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator,
+1 (non-binding) - good luck!
Dominik
-Original Message-
From: Yu Xiao
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 1:25 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+ 1 non-binding
Best wishes!
Yu Xiao
Apache ShenYu
俊平堵 于2022年8月30日周二 14
+ 1 non-binding
Best wishes!
Yu Xiao
Apache ShenYu
俊平堵 于2022年8月30日周二 14:33写道：
>
> +1 (binding). Good luck!
>
> tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道：
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> > a VO
+1 (binding). Good luck!
tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道：
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM tison wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the
CUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care
t; On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > Good Luck!
>> >
>> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on S
Hi,
+1 (binding) - best of luck!
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Good Luck!
> >
> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> > call
> > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apac
A few additional comments here:
1. As Justin said, you can select which one you want to choose (and ALv2 is a
good choice!). Some projects take extra measures to explicitly state which of
the two options they elect.
2. The ALv2 + LGPL option is common, primarily to accommodate projects under
Hi,
> hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found
> that many of them are dual protocol, for example
>
> org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed.
> 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1
> 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0
@Justin Mclean
hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found
that many of them are dual protocol, for example
org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed.
1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1
2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0
How
Hi Zhuoyu,
The mailing list cannot render images embedded. You can attach the file or
send a link to CDN for images.
If it's a screenshot for some content, you can just paste the content which
is better for reading and (partial) referencing.
Best,
tison.
陈卓宇 于2022年8月29日周一 11:27写道：
> The
The Streampark development community reacted quickly to the compliance
issues and now looks to have converged on completion, which is something we
should see.
[image: 图片.png]
Justin Mclean 于2022年8月29日周一 10:45写道：
> Hi,
>
> There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as
>
Hi,
There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as another
project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to discuss
overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each other or even
if possible reuse code.
Kind Regards,
Justin
@tksonjk tk
What is the logic of merging products that have the same functionality?
You make a search product and you ask Google search to go merge with your
project?
tksonjk tk 于2022年8月29日周一 01:30写道：
> -1,
>
> @tison, sorry, I can't get your point, please describe it again. how does
> it
;>
> >> [1] https://inlong.apache.org/
> >> [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark
> >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> >>
> >>> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
e.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
>
> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
>
sion email[3].
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Beam, Aviem Zur
> >>
> >> [1] https://inlong.apache.org/
> >> [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark
> >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
> >>
he.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
>>
>>> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
>> call
>>> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incu
k
> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
>
> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubat
ead/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3
On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
&g
ub.com/streamxhub/streampark[3]
https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3;>https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3On
2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: Hi all, Following
up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call a
VOTE to accept S
-1,
@tison, sorry, I can't get your point, please describe it again. how does
it differentiate to what StreamPipes does?
and how does it differentiate to what Apache Inlong does? These are all
handle stream calculation,
why not expand the function and create a new project instead?
Thanks, mysql-connector has been changed to optional. about GPL/LGPL
dependancies has also been updated to StreamPark Proposal [1]
1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
Best,
benjobs
Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道：
> HI,
>
> -1 (binding) because
lowing up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
> call
> > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
> the
> > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ]
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Thomas
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good Luck!
>
> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
>
+1 (non-binding)
Good Luck!
On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[
S] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care eit
+1 (non-binding)
Good luck!
Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道：
> HI,
>
> -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these
> will be dealt with.
>
> Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did
> it most likely would not be allowed in ASF
HI,
-1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these will
be dealt with.
Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did it
most likely would not be allowed in ASF project and you would be including GPL
licensed- code.
Kind Regards,
Justin
Park joining the Apache incubator
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > benjobs.
> >
> >
> > ---- Replied Message ----
> > From tison
> > Date 08/24/2022 11:56
> > To Incubator >
> > Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
2 11:56
> To Incubator
> Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
> StreamPark Proposal from
k tk 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道：
> > >
> > > > -1, (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain
> > > in
> > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > > > a company, do you nee
+1 (non-binding)
we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator
Best,
benjobs.
Replied Message
>From tison
Date 08/24/2022 11:56
To Incubator
Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi all,
Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamP
mm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you
> explain
> > > in
> > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not
> company-related?
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/
> in
> > > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> > >
> > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Following up on
you explain
> in
> > detail, thanks. and if you work for
> > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
> >
> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I
ntiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in
> detail, thanks. and if you work for
> a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related?
>
> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on
S] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to
call
> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out
the
> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care eit
Hi all,
Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call
a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the
StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator
[ ] +0, I don't care
47 matches
Mail list logo
