Hi all,
Thanks for all your votes. Here is the result:
4 + votes (binding)
1 + votes (non-binding)
0 - votes
Some comments for future votes that I'm about to address:
- Remove Apache license from licenses directory in Apache Crail
- Document libdisni requirements more clearly, especially when
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:09:36 -0800
Felix Cheung wrote:
Thanks for getting back to me Jonas.
Maybe I didn’t get the change in CRAIL-74. btw some of the JIRAs do
not
have links to github PR?
Yes that is unfortunate. The commits probably did not have links to the JIRA
issue.
We will make
Thanks for getting back to me Jonas.
Maybe I didn’t get the change in CRAIL-74. btw some of the JIRAs do not
have links to github PR?
Rat- yes thanks I think I was looking at a older change. I double check and
see the Pom file rat exclusion does not include docker or doc
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at
+1 (non-binding)
Checks Done :
- incubating in name
- hashes and signatures are good
- DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists
- ran RAT tool (6 template/conf files does not have ASF header, headers can be
added similar to [1], non-blocker)
- checked for archive matching git tag
[1]
Hi Felix
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:43:45 -0800
Felix Cheung wrote:
+1 (binding)
a few comments below, checked:
filename
signature & hash
DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE
build from src
no binary
src files have headers (see below)
comments, not blocker for release IMO:
1.
CREDITS file is a bit
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- signatures
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files
- ASF headers
- Build
Regards
JB
On 29/11/2018 15:50, Adrian Schuepbach wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Please vote to approve the release of Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc8).
>
> The podling dev vote thread:
>
>
+1 (binding)
Downloaded, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, built using JDK 8
on Linux, ran apache-rat. Checked that source tar ball matches git at
08c75b55f7f97be869049cf80a0da5347e550a3d.
In binary artifacts, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER.
Julian
> On Nov
+1 (binding)
a few comments below, checked:
filename
signature & hash
DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE
build from src
no binary
src files have headers (see below)
comments, not blocker for release IMO:
1.
CREDITS file is a bit non-standard in an ASF release - this is generally
not included as it is
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- No binary files
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
-
To
Hi all
Please vote to approve the release of Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc8).
The podling dev vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00519.html
The result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00526.html
Commit hash:
10 matches
Mail list logo