Re:[VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-10 Thread 陈明雨
Sorry that the title is wrong(Should be rc03, not rc02). I will start a new thread for the vote -- 此致!Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org At 2022-04-09 14:05:52, "陈明雨" wrote: >Hello Incubator Community: > > >Please review and vote on Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc03

Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name - LICENSE and NOTICE (maybe update the year to 2022 there) files are there and look good - DISCLAIMER is there - ASF header is present in code source - hash and signature look good Thanks, Regards JB On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 4:00 AM 陈明雨 wrote:

Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
Hi, I add some comments in PR, Another suggestion is that the release-note should not be in the form of a Github issue, because it can be modified. The common practice is to include a release-note file in the released package. 陈明雨 于2022年4月2日周六 10:08写道: > > Hi Kris, > Thanks for your review. >

Re:Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread 陈明雨
Hi Kris, Thanks for your review. Indeed I missed the NOTICE file for binary release. The NOTICE.txt you have seen is just for source release. For binary package, I have added new NOTICE for it, please help to review: https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/8813 And if that is OK, I will

Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
Calvin Kirs 于2022年4月1日周五 22:57写道: > > Hi, > + 0 (binding) > I only checked source packages. > > - incubating in the name > - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there and look good > - hash and signature look good > > I have some questions about binary packages, which is why I chose +0. > > I checked

Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-04-01 Thread Calvin Kirs
Hi, + 0 (binding) I only checked source packages. - incubating in the name - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there and look good - hash and signature look good I have some questions about binary packages, which is why I chose +0. I checked the corresponding binary package, but the dependencies

Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-03-30 Thread li gang
+1 (not binding) I checked - LICENSE and NOTICE files exist - DISCLAIMER file exist - Include the word incubating in the release file name. - Signatures and hashes are fine Suggest update the Notice year of `apache-doris-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz` to 2018-2022 in the next release. 陈明雨

Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-03-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in the name - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there and look good - hash and signature look good Regards JB On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 4:00 AM 陈明雨 wrote: > > Hellp Incubator Community: > > > Please review and vote on Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02 release.

Re: [VOTE] Vote for releasing Apache Doris 1.0.0-incubating-rc02

2022-03-28 Thread Willem Jiang
+1(binding) I checked: All the download links work. The License and Notice file in the source kit are good to me. There is no binary in the source release kit. We have the incubating disclarm in the source file. I checked the Licenses and Notice file of 3 convenience binaries. It looks like they