Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?

2017-10-19 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017, 13:28:57 CEST schrieb Zhu Sha Zang: > lol This is why you don't use tabs, people ;) . (I didn't bother to comment on it because I thought the text description was enough, but yes, it does look ridiculous. It looked fine in the draft, though.) -- Marc Joliet

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?

2017-10-19 Thread Zhu Sha Zang
lol On 10/18/2017 05:12 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017, 19:44:33 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: Hi, what is the better choice: This one: * media-gfx/cura Available versions: (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?

2017-10-18 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017, 19:44:33 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > Hi, > > what is the better choice: > This one: > * media-gfx/cura > Available versions: (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta > (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5 > python3_6"

[gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?

2017-10-18 Thread tuxic
Hi, what is the better choice: This one: * media-gfx/cura Available versions: (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5 python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"} Homepage: