On 08/30/2017 01:51 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Like I mention in another thread (and like Rich touches on) power
> savings can be an incentive to upgrade, besides the increase in speed.
> Power efficiency and speed generally increase in multiples greater
> than one, so you are reducing the cost and time
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 08:09 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>
>>> Isn't it amazing how efficient and fast newer computers are? It's
>>> almost
Hello, Daniel.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 07:49:49 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote:
[ ]
> For the frontend replacement I think I'm going to jump to one of the
> Ryzen products. I don't need ThreadRipper there, but one of their other
> processors will work. The backend will get a faster processor but
On 08/29/2017 08:09 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Isn't it amazing how efficient and fast newer computers are? It's
>> almost worth the energy saving to upgrade. If a person runs their
>> system 24/7, that is
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Dale wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, wabe wrote:
>>> I'm using an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor. I bought it six or seven
>>> years ago when it was brand-new. It still works to my
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, wabe wrote:
>> I'm using an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor. I bought it six or seven
>> years ago when it was brand-new. It still works to my satisfaction. But
>> of course recent CPUs (for example AMD Ryzen) are much
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:54 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello, I apologize for the tangents.
>
> The only on-topic comments I can offer are that: yes, those parts seem
> to be usable with Gentoo, whereas similarly old parts a decade ago
> were not; and, I have been looking for a low
Hello, I apologize for the tangents.
The only on-topic comments I can offer are that: yes, those parts seem
to be usable with Gentoo, whereas similarly old parts a decade ago
were not; and, I have been looking for a low power server setup and
would appreciate if you could communicate your
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:29 PM, wabe wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, wabe wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm using an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor. I bought it six or
>> > seven years ago when it was
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, wabe wrote:
> >
> > I'm using an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor. I bought it six or
> > seven years ago when it was brand-new. It still works to my
> > satisfaction. But of course recent CPUs (for
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, wabe wrote:
>
> I'm using an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor. I bought it six or seven
> years ago when it was brand-new. It still works to my satisfaction. But
> of course recent CPUs (for example AMD Ryzen) are much faster. Therefore
> I
mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> any one have experiance with athlon, Phenom, and opteron? if so i'm
> curios if it's worth a $15-20 expense.
>
> --
> The Power Of the People Is Stronger Than The People In Charge.
Check this site out:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php
wrote:
> any one have experiance with athlon, Phenom, and opteron? if so i'm
> curios if it's worth a $15-20 expense.
I'm using an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor. I bought it six or seven
years ago when it was brand-new. It still works to my
any one have experiance with athlon, Phenom, and opteron? if so i'm curios if
it's worth a $15-20 expense.
--
The Power Of the People Is Stronger Than The People In Charge.
14 matches
Mail list logo