You are welcome to volunteer to help make a release, next one is mid
November :)
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 10:23, Gabriel Roldan
wrote:
> Have a community +1 here from someone that keeps promising himself to be
> more active on the project
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 06:13, Andrea
On October 1, 2019 10:04:14 a.m. PDT, "Rahkonen Jukka (MML)"
wrote:
>+1
>
>-Jukka Rahkonen
>
>Lähettäjä: Andrea Aime
>Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. syyskuuta 2019 12.13
>Vastaanottaja: Geoserver-devel
>Aihe: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 180 discussion: committer list c
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen
Lähettäjä: Andrea Aime
Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. syyskuuta 2019 12.13
Vastaanottaja: Geoserver-devel
Aihe: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 180 discussion: committer list cleanup and
committer requirements
Hi,
the committer list in GeoServer is in a outdated/messy state
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:13 PM Jody Garnett wrote:
> I would also like to clean out the sourceforge admins (cholmes, justin,
> etc...) if we can fold that into this proposal.
>
That is a good idea, I've updated the proposal to account for that too, let
me know what you think:
I would also like to clean out the sourceforge admins (cholmes, justin,
etc...) if we can fold that into this proposal.
I am not sure what to do with community modules? I guess it is a very quick
email to get access again...
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 02:13, Andrea Aime
wrote:
>
Have a community +1 here from someone that keeps promising himself to be
more active on the project
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 06:13, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> the committer list in GeoServer is in a outdated/messy state, the
> following proposal
> tries to address it, while also adding some easy
+1
I would also add a Rule to demote modules for which there is no maintainer
anymore (unless someone else pops up).
This would give some food for thoughts to whoever wants to become a
maintainer of a module.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit
Look s like a good proposal to me, fair and straightforward rules.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:59 AM Ian Turton wrote:
> Looks fine to me +1
>
> Ian
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 10:13, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> the committer list in GeoServer is in a outdated/messy state, the
>> following
Looks fine to me +1
Ian
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 10:13, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> the committer list in GeoServer is in a outdated/messy state, the
> following proposal
> tries to address it, while also adding some easy requirements for the
> committers, in terms
> of community presence:
>
>
+1 go ahead Andrea
Il giorno dom 22 set 2019 alle ore 11:13 Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto:
> Hi,
> the committer list in GeoServer is in a outdated/messy state, the
> following proposal
> tries to address it, while also adding some easy requirements for the
> committers,
Hi,
the committer list in GeoServer is in a outdated/messy state, the following
proposal
tries to address it, while also adding some easy requirements for the
committers, in terms
of community presence:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-180
Please discuss :-D
Cheers
Andrea
==
11 matches
Mail list logo