Hi,
I was just about to apply a DR by David. First I ran
$ arc patch D390
which put me on a feature branch. Then I reworded the commit with
$ git commit --amend
and then I tried to land it with
$ arc land
Luckily I also passed --hold...
It even asked me if I want to land the commit although I
Adding core-libraries, whose bailiwick this is.
Simon
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of David Feuer
Sent: 29 October 2014 00:24
To: ghc-devs
Subject: Is USE_REPORT_PRELUDE still useful?
A lot of code in GHC.List and perhaps elsewhere compiles differently
On 29 Oct 2014, at 00:24, David Feuer wrote:
A lot of code in GHC.List and perhaps elsewhere compiles differently
depending on whether USE_REPORT_PRELUDE is defined. Not all code differing
from the Prelude implementation. Furthermore, I don't know to what extent, if
any, such code
Hi All,
Sorry for the late reply, I need to adjust my mail filtering rules to let
these mails go to my inbox as well.
I have also taken a few passes through the windows trac and there are a lot
of issues with someone assigned to them but with no activity so a while on
them. I was also wondering
On 2014-10-29 at 10:59:18 +0100, Phyx wrote:
[...]
The Win32 package for example, is dreadfully lacking in
maintainership. While we merge patches, it would be great to see a
Windows developer spearhead and clean it up
A while back I was looking at adding some functionality to this
package,
By the way, regarding that repository, could someone merge my pull request
https://github.com/haskell/win32/pull/27?
In general, it's a bit frustrating how a lot of the patches in the
Phabricator queue seem to take a while to get noticed. Don't take it
personally, I'm just sharing my impressions,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Gintautas Miliauskas
gintau...@miliauskas.lt wrote:
By the way, regarding that repository, could someone merge my pull request
https://github.com/haskell/win32/pull/27?
The problem here is that the official maintainer according to
I bet Bryan would willingly cede maintainership of Win32. I’m copying him.
Bryan?
From: Herbert Valerio Riedel [mailto:hvrie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 October 2014 12:47
To: Gintautas Miliauskas
Cc: Phyx; Simon Peyton Jones; kyra; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: GHC on Windows (extended/broad
I could definitely see moving the code to comments.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:45 AM, Simon Peyton Jones simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
Adding core-libraries, whose bailiwick this is.
Simon
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of David Feuer
Sent:
Ack! That -is- a somewhat scary invisible backdoor dependency. :/
We ripped out a lot of unused and untestable ifdefs for other compilers from
base a couple of years back, I'd be curious if this was already affected.
Any idea where the code for the report generation lies?
-Edward
On Oct 29,
Hi devs,
There's a feature I've wanted for some time, and I don't see a good reason not
to ask: Is it possible to email comments into Trac? My commute involves a ~40
minute train ride, which I generally can use productively despite no
connection. One of the biggest annoyances, though, is that
I guess maybe we could install this plugin:
https://oss.trac.surfsara.nl/email2trac
Edward
Excerpts from Richard Eisenberg's message of 2014-10-29 08:52:01 -0700:
Hi devs,
There's a feature I've wanted for some time, and I don't see a good reason
not to ask: Is it possible to email
As part of my ongoing efforts to round-trip source code, I have bumped into
an issue around file header pragmas, e.g.
{-# LANGUAGE PatternSynonyms #-}
{-# Language DeriveFoldable #-}
{-# options_ghc -w #-}
In normal mode, when not called from headerInfo, the file header pragmas
are
Ok, to answer my own question, I changed nested_comment to
nested_comment :: P (RealLocated Token) - Action
nested_comment cont span buf len = do
input - getInput
go (reverse $ lexemeToString buf len) (1::Int) input
It now starts off with the already lexed part.
On Wed, Oct
No need to cede maintainership, but I found it to be good practice to have
additional people with commit rights to facilitate prompt submission of
cleanups and minor changes that do not have architectural impact.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Simon Peyton Jones simo...@microsoft.com
wrote:
https://phabricator.haskell.org/D400
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Gintautas Miliauskas
gintau...@miliauskas.lt wrote:
FYI, after the fix ghc builds again on Windows 32-bit, but validate.sh
fails:
rts\Linker.c: In function 'allocateImageAndTrampolines':
rts\Linker.c:3657:31:
Sorry about this; merged - 208a0c207c1001da0fe63e9640e2a7e0e11c4aff
(I actually only built the RTS to fix that build failure... I didn't
./validate with -Wall enabled. I'm to blame here!)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Gintautas Miliauskas
gintau...@miliauskas.lt wrote:
2014-10-28 21:49 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Miliauskas gintau...@miliauskas.lt:
Can you try running the offending command with -v to see which step
breaks?
I have tried it, even together with building the GHC sources with a
recent toolchain, but I did not get much forward.
I tried running it locally
18 matches
Mail list logo
