Hi Niklas
This is indeed looks interesting and I think I saw behavior similar to
this one. At the moment I'm working through ghc-events code to get
myself a better understanding on what is going on in threads scheduler
and get a tool that can handle event stream incrementally, once I'm
done with
Hey Michael, greetings!
Here's a little side issue that may also be of interest to you in case
you've got HyperThreading on:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10229
Niklas
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
2017-09-30 17:56 GMT+02:00 Joachim Breitner :
> [...] I also wonder whether, when using cachegrind, the results from
> different machines are actually comparable. [...]
>
In general, they are not really comparable: cachegrind doesn't collect
*actual* cache statistics,
Hi,
update ton this:
Am Freitag, den 22.09.2017, 09:06 -0400 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I have switched perf.haskell.org to run nofib with
> $ make -C nofib EXTRA_RUNTEST_OPTS=-cachegrind NoFibRuns=1 mode=slow -j8
it looks like this will not work out, with the current setup;
perf.haskell.org
Dear devs,
> Thank you very much for the response and kind explanation.
> After studying, I will submit to ghc-proposals :)
I submitted a ghc-proposal #76 [1].
Please feedback:)
[1]: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/76
Regards,
Takenobu
2017-09-26 23:05 GMT+09:00 Takenobu