-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/07/13 16:26, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:31:47PM +0100, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
I have turned some comments in compiler/hsSyn/HsBinds.lhs into
Haddock format. They were just sitting there, hidden from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/13 15:43, Jan Stolarek wrote:
I just ran validation (once without any parameters and once with
--normal) and got no failures, except for some tests that always
fail. Looks like the problem may be solved.
Janek
Dnia wtorek, 25 czerwca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/13 21:06, Jan Stolarek wrote:
T149 has been failing for a very long time (a few weeks at least).
I also had process007 fail.
Janek
Dnia wtorek, 25 czerwca 2013, Mateusz Kowalczyk napisaĆ:
On 25/06/13 15:43, Jan Stolarek wrote:
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/06/13 11:08, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
Hi all,
I've implemented the proposal at
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/NewAxioms/Nonlinearity,
which involved a few changes to HsDecl datatypes (FamilyDecl,
TyFamInstDecl, etc.), thus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/06/13 12:23, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
-Original Message- From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:ghc-devs- boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz
Kowalczyk
This means your GHC is too old. Compile from git and try again.
I
bjxukm7b56XtazyUk2BX
=0okt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From da62e4b7bf2f8eaa097e01a1284a98fe41cc7b5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:16:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Haddockify some existing comments.
---
compiler/hsSyn/HsBinds.lhs | 78
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/13 02:46, Johan Tibell wrote:
Unfortunately we don't use submodules for all repos e.g. base. This
makes it very hard to accurately check out a previous state and
bisect errors unfortunately.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Kazu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/05/13 18:32, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:14:52PM +0100, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
Is there any update on this please?
Sorry, no progress yet.
Out of curiosity, what's the reason behind missing binaries?
Hopefully my GHC
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo