Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com writes:
Hi Simon,
We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant
customers with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally
to their codebases, so it's not a necessity to get this into upstream GHC
7.10. It would be nice
Ben Gamari b...@smart-cactus.org writes:
Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com writes:
Hi Simon,
We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant
customers with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally
to their codebases, so it's not a necessity to get
[mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| | Mateusz Kowalczyk
| | Sent: 06 July 2015 17:40
| | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| | Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
| |
| | On 04/20/2015 05:29 PM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
| | Hello everybody,
| |
| | I'm glad
-
| | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| | Mateusz Kowalczyk
| | Sent: 06 July 2015 17:40
| | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| | Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
| |
| | On 04/20/2015 05:29 PM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote
; ghc-devs@haskell.org
*Cc:* Mark Lentczner
*Subject:* Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
Hi Simon,
We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant
customers with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally
to their codebases, so it's
; Mateusz Kowalczyk; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Cc: Mark Lentczner
Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
Hi Simon,
We had a small pow-wow over here. We're already providing relevant customers
with a custom-built GHC, and only using this feature internally to their
codebases, so it's
.
Noted, thanks.
Thanks
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz
| Kowalczyk
| Sent: 06 July 2015 17:40
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
|
| On 04/20/2015 05:29
2015 17:40
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
|
| On 04/20/2015 05:29 PM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
| Hello everybody,
|
| I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part
| of
| my work for FP Complete!
|
| With the help
On 04/20/2015 05:29 PM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part of
my work for FP Complete!
With the help of Eric (thanks for your support in #ghc!) we now have this
patch for 7.10 and 7.8.
As promised, here are
Hi Niklas,
Fyi: what about assert? Afaik, there is special treatment in the compiler
for the assert that could be replaced by this (?).
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Niklas Hambüchen m...@nh2.me wrote:
Yes, I do have work in progress on using this feature in `error` and
`undefined`.
I will
On 22/04/15 01:33, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
I will upload that as a Phabricator Diff soon, and mention the URL here.
Here it is: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D861
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
On 22/04/15 02:42, RodLogic wrote:
Fyi: what about assert? Afaik, there is special treatment in the
compiler for the assert that could be replaced by this (?).
Yes, replacing the custom code for `assert` was also on Eric's plan, see
the comment he just made:
Yes, I do have work in progress on using this feature in `error` and
`undefined`.
I will upload that as a Phabricator Diff soon, and mention the URL here.
Niklas
On 21/04/15 02:07, Greg Weber wrote:
Thanks a lot! Is there any plan to make error or other partial functions
in the base libraries
Thanks a lot! Is there any plan to make error or other partial functions in
the base libraries use this feature?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Niklas Hambüchen m...@nh2.me wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part of
my work for FP
Hello everybody,
I'm glad to announce that I performed the suggested backporting as part of
my work for FP Complete!
With the help of Eric (thanks for your support in #ghc!) we now have this
patch for 7.10 and 7.8.
As promised, here are the commits:
*
Thanks for the feedback everyone. If/when we decide to backport the patch,
we'll be sure to make the commit available for others interested in running
a custom build of GHC. And thank you for the offer of help Eric, it's much
appreciated :)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:14 PM Eric Seidel
Subject: Backporting srcLoc to the GHC 7.10 branch
It looks like the srcLoc change[1] is something that some of our (FP
Complete's) customers would be quite interested in getting access to sooner
rather than later. Would there be any possibility of getting that patch merged
into the 7.10 branch
Hi Michael,
I actually tried to adopt this patch into 7.10, because I thought it
was needed for another dependent patch we wanted. Unfortunately, the
backtrace-via-implicit-params patch seems to depend on some prior work
by Simon PJ in the typechecker (-fwarn-redundant-constraints, a rather
large
IIRC the patch doesn't directly depend on -fwarn-redundant-constraints,
but I think I ran into some merge conflicts that had to be resolved. I
agree with Austin that backporting it should be doable, and would be
happy to help if there's interest.
Also, I still mean to submit a follow-on patch
19 matches
Mail list logo
