On this thread, a representative collection of *reproducible examples* with the
actual error message and the desired one, would be tremendously helpful.
Lacking that, it’s hard to know where to begin. (Creating the examples takes
a bit of work, I know.)
Start a wiki page! Stuff in email
Don't forget to make a Feature Request on Trac
(https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket) with a link to the wiki page. Trac
is really the only way things like this don't get lost.
Thanks!
Richard
On Jun 19, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Ömer Sinan Ağacan omeraga...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks
Great, thanks for doing this! I'm afraid even if you succeed with patch we
would still need more real-world examples that show the need for this
feature, and I think this is separate from GHC tests, as they don't need to
be realistic, but of course please continue and hopefully more examples
will
Done: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10547
2015-06-19 9:12 GMT-04:00 Richard Eisenberg e...@cis.upenn.edu:
Don't forget to make a Feature Request on Trac
(https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket) with a link to the wiki page.
Trac is really the only way things like this don't get
Great, thanks Kostiantyn! I'm looking for simple examples that we can
add to GHC testsuite, if I find something I'll update the wiki page
also.
I made some progress on the patch, I think I can hopefully submit
something this weekend for reviews.
2015-06-19 5:16 GMT-04:00 Kostiantyn Rybnikov
I think 4945 is failing again -- although not on my machine. Can someone mark
it expect_broken again? I'm on a train
S
| -Original Message-
| From: nore...@phabricator.haskell.org
| [mailto:nore...@phabricator.haskell.org]
| Sent: 19 June 2015 00:09
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
| Subject:
Created some initial wiki-page with just one example, will keep it in mind
to add more as seen.
https://wiki.haskell.org/Expanding_type_synonyms_in_error_messages_proposal
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Simon Peyton Jones simo...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On this thread, a representative
Strange stuff. I just pushed this, so the builds should start going
green again soon.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
I think 4945 is failing again -- although not on my machine. Can someone
mark it expect_broken again? I'm on a train
S
|
I have no problem with plan 4. However, I'll point out that
implementing CPP is not *that* hard... :)
Cheers,
Simon
On 18/06/2015 09:32, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Hello *,
Following up on the Native -XCPP Proposal discussion, it appears that
cpphs' current LGPL+SLE licensing doesn't
