I used to be a 80 chars kind of guy, but working with Simon on the type
checker, I did get into the habit of using 120. It has stuck with me.
Especially in Haskell, there is a lot of value in that additional space,
especially if you like to have descriptive identifiers.
(In statement-oriented
As I wrote that I came to the same conclusion, but decided to leave the
rest in case.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:25 AM, GHC wrote:
> #11028: Refactor ConDecl
> -+-
> Reporter: simonpj
I think I'm the one who requested that the backwards compatibility be added
back in. I have no objection to removing it at this point.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Pickering <
matthewtpicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The [$qq| quasiquote syntax has been deprecated since around 2010.
>
>
I'm all for it, if the broader community (e.g. the developers of those
packages) are ok.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Matthew Pickering
| Sent: 25 November 2015 12:12
| To: GHC developers
|
The [$qq| quasiquote syntax has been deprecated since around 2010.
Is there any objection to removing the backwards compatibility now?
I counted 216 uses of it on hackage in a handful of packages, some in comments.
http://lpaste.net/145938
Here is the commit which deprecated it -
I don’t have a strong view but like Richard I find 80 chars limiting.
I agree that we should resolve this and write down the result on the coding
style page
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Richard Eisenberg
| Sent: 25
I just pushed to wip/T11028
It is very much a work in progress, working through to sort out the
compiler errors, in the simplest way at the moment.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:06 PM, GHC wrote:
> #11028: Refactor ConDecl
>
2015-11-24 22:14 GMT-05:00 Evan Laforge :
> Would anyone mind if I went and wrapped a bunch of files, say
> typecheck/*.hs? This seems simpler than either constant hassling from
> arc or coming up with more elaborate rules for arc. I would have to
> make some formatting