I submitted https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1889 which hopefully
fixes this properly.
2016-02-05 21:50 GMT-05:00 Ömer Sinan Ağacan :
> Simon, I broke the debug build with that commit. I actually validated locally
> before committing, but apparently the default validate
On 02/06/2016 03:55 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> But despite all the negativity in this thread, I want to say that your
> work on this and other aspects of GHC is very much appreciated. Keep it up!
>
+1000
___
ghc-devs mailing list
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Mike Izbicki wrote:
> > We're in a bit of a bind in all this. We really need the fancy type for
> ($)
> > so that it can be used in all situations where it is used currently. The
> old
> > type for ($) was just a plain old lie. Now, at least,
I have made a ticket #11549 (https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11549)
requesting a -fshow-runtime-rep flag (recalling that the name levity will soon
be outdated) as described in this thread. I will make sure this gets in for the
release of 8.0.
Other points:
- You're quite right that
My apologies for that. Please ignore.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Eric Crockett wrote:
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7803#comment:12
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, GHC wrote:
>
>> #7803: Superclass methods are left
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7803#comment:12
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, GHC wrote:
> #7803: Superclass methods are left unspecialized
> -+-
> Reporter: akio |
> On 06 Feb 2016, at 15:30, ghc-d...@stefan-klinger.de wrote:
>
> Richard, thank you very much for your elaborate statement. The
> problem I see with a `BeginnersPrelude` is that it will either
> outdate, or create a bubble escaping from which is so painful that
> most new Haskell programmers
That makes a lot of sense to me.
Manuel
> Roman Cheplyaka :
>
> On 02/05/2016 01:31 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
>> I'm not really sure how you would change the type of 'id' based on
>> a language pragma.
>>
>> How do people feel about a cosmetic fix, where we introduce a new
>>
On 02/06/2016 02:09 AM, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
> The old type of ($) was always a lie. -XMagicHash just changes the
> parser, allowing the # suffix. It is only by convention that most (all?)
> unlifted things end in #. The old type of ($) was perhaps a harmless
> lie, but a lie nonetheless.
>
>