Hi Ömer,
Thanks for the pointers, should help me find out more.
It’s not a stock GHC as I’m working on getting Dynamic linking back on Windows.
This assert is triggered on the dyn version of the libs. So something’s bit
rotted here.
Cheers,
Tamar
From: Ömer Sinan Ağacan
Sent: Tuesday, June
Hi Tamar,
Have a look at Note [Disgusting computation of CafRefs] in TidyPgm.hs. The
assertion triggered here is the one that checks `hasCafRefs` mentioned in that
note matches with actual CAF-ness.
Are you using stock GHC? Which version? Do you have a minimal program that
reproduces this?
Simon Peyton Jones writes:
> | tests/alloc/haddock.Cabal 11811321368 + 6.40% 12567003040
> | bytes
> | tests/alloc/haddock.compiler 60211764264 + 7.39%
> | 64658444232 bytes
> |
> | The haddock stats changes are probably genuine, I
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2016, 08:18 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
> For the record, the series of patches, one of which presumably causes
> the regression, is below. Bisecting to the right one would be very
> helpful -- but you have to apply the final one (haddock-update)
> first.
I
| tests/alloc/haddock.Cabal 11811321368 + 6.40% 12567003040
| bytes
| tests/alloc/haddock.compiler 60211764264 + 7.39%
| 64658444232 bytes
|
| The haddock stats changes are probably genuine, I assume, but the
| expected value in all.T should be
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.06.2016, 22:54 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
> I hope that should settle things.
it does, but unfortunately, now perf.haskell.org can only give
aggregate results for the joint commit:
Benchmark name previous change now