Great. No rush. Yell if you need help.
Simon
From: Richard Fung [mailto:minesasec...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 June 2016 19:05
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Help on first ticket
Hi Simon, I am making progress but slowly (I only have time to
Hi Simon, I am making progress but slowly (I only have time to work on this
outside of work unfortunately).
If this needs to be done soon feel free to reassign it to someone else!
Otherwise, while at times I feel like I'm over my head I would like to keep
at it.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:20 AM,
These failures are odd. One is this change in T8761 which I'm sure is not my
fault. I saw that simonmar did some hFlush thing -- could that be it?
Simon
+++ ./T8761.run/T8761.comp.stderr.normalised2016-06-24 15:00:22.975083533
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+pattern Q1 x1_0 x2_1 x3_2 <- ((x1_0,
Richard, did you get on ok?
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Ben
| Gamari
| Sent: 04 June 2016 23:20
| To: Richard Fung ; ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Help on first ticket
|
| Richard
Thanks Thomas!
From: Thomas Miedema [mailto:thomasmied...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 June 2016 10:05
To: Ömer Sinan Ağacan
Cc: Simon Peyton Jones ; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Testsuite cleaning
Fixed. See https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12112
Fixed. See https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12112 for details.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Ömer Sinan Ağacan
wrote:
> I also realized this after a rebase I did yesterday. Should be a recent
> thing.
>
> 2016-06-24 7:58 GMT+00:00 Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
I also realized this after a rebase I did yesterday. Should be a recent thing.
2016-06-24 7:58 GMT+00:00 Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
:
> Thomas
>
> During debugging I often compile a single test program
>
> ghc -c T1969.hs
>
> But the new testsuite setup
Thomas
During debugging I often compile a single test program
ghc -c T1969.hs
But the new testsuite setup doesn’t remove .hi and .o files before running a
test, so
make TEST=T1969
says
bytes allocated value is too low:
…
Deviation T1969(normal) bytes allocated: