Re: comment lines in Cmm outputs

Ömer Sinan Ağacan writes: > Wait, isn't new codegen merged years ago? I don't see these comment > lines in 8.0.1-generated Cmm files. Comments in the AST may be there > but no comments were printed until very recently. > Are you sure you are looking at code generated with

Re: comment lines in Cmm outputs

2016-05-29 11:14 GMT-04:00 Ben Gamari : > CmmUnsafeForeignCall as it looks quite similar to > a CmmCall Well then maybe we should print those differently instead of adding noise to every single line just to distinguish CmmUnsafeForeignCall from CmmCall.

Re: comment lines in Cmm outputs

Wait, isn't new codegen merged years ago? I don't see these comment lines in 8.0.1-generated Cmm files. Comments in the AST may be there but no comments were printed until very recently. If no one feels strongly about this I'd love to remove those. 2016-05-29 11:14 GMT-04:00 Ben Gamari

Re: comment lines in Cmm outputs

Ömer Sinan Ağacan writes: > I'm reading a lot of Cmm these days and comments added by Cmm dump (which are > apparently added after 8.0.1) are so annoying becuase they're not saying > anything useful (what's the point of adding "// CmmCall" to a "call" line or > "//

comment lines in Cmm outputs

I'm reading a lot of Cmm these days and comments added by Cmm dump (which are apparently added after 8.0.1) are so annoying becuase they're not saying anything useful (what's the point of adding "// CmmCall" to a "call" line or "// CmmCondBranch" to a "if" line?) but making a lot of noise. Why