Re: End of Windows Vista support in GHC-8.6?

>> I have updated https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Platforms/Windows >> accordingly. >> >> Cheers, >> Simon >> >> 2018-03-05 18:29 GMT+01:00 Phyx <loneti...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018

Re: End of Windows Vista support in GHC-8.6?

t;> > >>> Thanks everyone! > >>> > >>> I have updated https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Platforms/Windows > >>> accordingly. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> 2018

Re: Potential improvements for CSE, strictness analyzer, let-floating

Hi Peter, as a start, here are few tickets concerning CSE: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/query?status=!closed=~CSE I'm not sure if there are keywords for strictness analysis or let-floating on Trac. Here's the full list of keywords: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/report/25?max=500. Hope

Re: Motivation for refineDefaultAlt

Hi! I thought refineDefaultAlt was about scenarios like this: data D = C0 | C1 | C2 case e of DEFAULT -> e0 C0 -> e1 C1 -> e1 When we apply combineIdenticalAlts to this expression, it can't combine the alts for C0 and C1, as we already have a default case. If we apply

Status of the Hi Haddock project

Hi! I have summarized the status of my GSoC project at https://sjakobi.github.io/blog/2018/08/14/hi-haddock-3/ My WIP patches for GHC and haddock are at https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5067 and https://github.com/haskell/haddock/pull/906. Cheers, Simon

Re: GHC 8.6.1 release status

Hi Ben, I talked to Alex about these today: * PR #905 has been merged. * PR #893 requires the merge of https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5003. Apart from that there were no objections. Cheers, Simon Am Di., 21. Aug. 2018 um 17:09 Uhr schrieb Ben Gamari : > Sven Panne writes: > > > Am Mo., 20.

Re: GHC 8.6.1 release status

sure either. CC'ing Herbert. Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb Sven Panne : > Am Di., 21. Aug. 2018 um 17:14 Uhr schrieb Simon Jakobi via ghc-devs < > ghc-devs@haskell.org>: > >> I talked to Alex about these today: >> >> * PR #905 has been mer

Re: End of Windows Vista support in GHC-8.6?

2018-03-05 18:29 GMT+01:00 Phyx : > > > No objections, however do make sure to test both 32 and 64 bit builds of > ghc when you use the API, it's new enough and rare enough that it may not > be implemented in both mingw-64 tool chains (we've had similar issues > before). >

Re: How do you build the haddocks for a boot library?

Ah, ok! Thanks for the fix, Ben! 2018-04-09 17:13 GMT+02:00 Ben Gamari <b...@well-typed.com>: > Simon Jakobi via ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I have some changes to the haddocks in ghc-prim which are re-exported >> from base. In

How do you build the haddocks for a boot library?

Hi, I have some changes to the haddocks in ghc-prim which are re-exported from base. In order to check that I got the syntax right I've tried to build the haddocks by following https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Docs#Haddockdocumentation. Sadly, when I run "make html" in

In which format should GHC expose documentation via its .hi-files?

Hi! In preparation for the coding phase of the Hi Haddock proposal that I want to implement, I need a decision on the format in which we should expose haddocks in GHC's .hi interface files. Please visit https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/805, ask questions, make suggestions and help me

Someone please delete my Trac report

Hi! Could someone with the appropriate permissions please delete report #26 "Interesting" at https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/report? When I saved my query I didn't expect that it would be visible to everyone. Cheers, Simon ___ ghc-devs mailing list

End of Windows Vista support in GHC-8.6?

Hi! Given that Vista’s EOL was in April 2017 i assume that there’s no intention to keep supporting it in GHC-8.6!? I’m asking because I intend to use a function

Re: End of Windows Vista support in GHC-8.6?

Thanks everyone! I have updated https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Platforms/Windows accordingly. Cheers, Simon 2018-03-05 18:29 GMT+01:00 Phyx <loneti...@gmail.com>: > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 17:23 Ben Gamari <b...@well-typed.com> wrote: > >> Simon

Re: Help on tuple section in TH

Hi Yotam, welcome to GHC development! :) I'll try to give you a few pointers although I'm not really familiar with this part of of the code. * Read the module header at the top of DsMeta.hs. * Note that DsMeta exposes a single function, dsBracket. All code in DsMeta is ultimately used via this

Re: GitLab CI for patches across submodules

Am Sa., 5. Jan. 2019 um 22:18 Uhr schrieb Ben Gamari : However, we can certainly use the upstream repo during CI builds. I have opened !78 which should hopefully fix this. Perhaps you could rebase on topp of this and check? > Thanks, Ben, that works for me. What I hadn't realized before, is

Re: [GHC DevOps Group] GitLab migration status

Hi Ben, in my experience Gitlab has been extremely slow at showing commit diffs to the point that it gives up and returns a 502: https://gitlab.staging.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/issues/15944 Is this possibly related to any resource constraints on our instance? Cheers, Simon Am Mo., 17. Dez. 2018 um

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.6.5 is now available

Hi Ben! Thanks for the release! Can you also upload the source tarballs? Cheers, Simon Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 06:56 Uhr schrieb Ben Gamari : > > Hello everyone, > > The GHC team is proud to announce the release of GHC 8.6.5. The source > distribution, binary distributions, and documentation

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.8.2-rc1 is now available

Thanks for all the bug fixes! :) > - A typechecker bug (#12088) resulting in programs being unexpectedly >rejected has been fixed. https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/issues/12088 is still open and doesn't appear to have seen that much recent activity. Is this the right ticket? Cheers,

Re: haskell/bytestring stalled?

Hi Herbert, I apologize for the overly harsh and accusatory tone in my last email. After looking through the existing PRs and issues, I was admittedly somewhat disappointed over the current situation with bytestring issues and PRs, but I shouldn't have expressed my feelings in this way. Also,

Re: haskell/bytestring stalled?

I'm also CC'ing the core libraries committee – sorry for not realizing earlier that they would be interested in this discussion! Am Do., 19. Dez. 2019 um 17:20 Uhr schrieb Simon Jakobi : > > Hi Herbert, > > I apologize for the overly harsh and accusatory tone in my last email. > After looking

Re: Measuring compiler performance

er-link-flags > ``` > > Cheers, > > Matt > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:15 PM Simon Jakobi via ghc-devs > wrote: > > > > Many thanks, Richard, Andreas, Joachim, and Ben, for your responses! I > > have a few things to try now. :) > > > > >

Re: Measuring compiler performance

Many thanks, Richard, Andreas, Joachim, and Ben, for your responses! I have a few things to try now. :) > * what I call the "Cabal test"; namely: > > $ _build/stage1/bin/ghc -O -ilibraries/Cabal/Cabal \ > libraries/Cabal/Cabal/Setup.hs +RTS -s Thanks for spelling it out

Measuring compiler performance

Hi devs! I've recently started working on a few compiler perf related tickets, and wondered how to verify that a change actually has a positive impact on compiler performance. I first looked at the wiki for information on this, but didn't find much:

Re: IP/key change for gitlab.haskell.org?

Hi Richard, Ben had pointed out this issue in https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2020-June/019000.html On my system I used the command ssh-keygen -f "/home/simon/.ssh/known_hosts" -R gitlab.haskell.org to remove the problematic key. The next `git pull` then included a prompt to

Re: config.sub

Hi Simon, I haven't experienced this issue myself, but I've seen a merge request intended to address it: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5372 Cheers, Simon Am Fr., 26. März 2021 um 18:38 Uhr schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs : > > Folks > > I’m getting a lot of this >

Re: trouble with formatted Haddock documentation for new module

Hi Norman, https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/472 is a long-standing, related issue. Unfortunately I'm not aware of any workarounds. Simon Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Norman Ramsey : > > In a new module I'm writing for GHC, I define a record type that has a > ton of named

Re: Serious bug in GHC 9.4 on basic math on aarch64

I've spread your message on r/haskell and Discourse: * https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/y215qi/serious_bug_in_ghc_94_on_basic_math_on_aarch64 * https://discourse.haskell.org/t/serious-bug-in-ghc-9-4-on-basic-math-on-aarch64/5167 Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 01:46 Uhr schrieb Ian-Woo Kim :