Hi,
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 18:56 +0200, GSR - FR wrote:
Looked at XFixes X11 extension? I think all the apps that show the
correct pointer shape use that extension to copy the pixmaps and then
stamp them in the final image/video.
Good point. The XFixes extension seems to have code to do this.
The things can be visually organized like the Inkscape does:
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Roadmap . As I think, the
roadmap at their site is much late to the current features implemented,
but the whole framework represents the picture.
Although there can be something like
Hi,
so it looks like we should toss some ideas around here on the
mailing-list to get an idea what could be our goals for 2.6. Let me just
propose a few things for discussion:
- Port internals to GEGL
We are pretty sure that we want to do this but we need a more
thorough proposal of what
Gimp 4.0 seems to bug in fullscreen mode with fluxbox. When I zoom an
image, the background window follows the image dimensions instead of freeze.
I can't test the bug with another WM.
I love gimp 4.0 and the new gimp website ! :-)
Regards.
--
Damien
On 10/26/07, saulgoode wrote:
Finally, there should be an effort to maintain integrity of the XCF
file format by converting between the core implementation of layer
groups and parasites attached to drawables during saves and loads of
XCF files (older GIMP versions would read the files but
Regarding the process of developing a roadmap, I think this mailing
list should be where proposals are made and commented upon (there has
already been some nice commentary in this thread). The main GIMP
developers should fairly rapidly be able to come to a decision about
the roadmap
A change in file formats should be postponed until a bump in the major
version number takes place (per GNU coding standards?). But my
proposal of adding parasites containing layer group meta-data to files
saved in the current XCF standard is indeed merely an interim
solution, permitting
Hi, I'ts been a while since I've last written here.
First of all congrats for getting 2.4 out the door.
I'm not a developer, just a humble graphic artist semi-professional UI
designer.
I think making a roadmap is a very important step in the development of Gimp.
But I suggest before that, Gimp
On 10/26/07, Micahel Grosberg wrote:
I think making a roadmap is a very important step in the development of Gimp.
But I suggest before that, Gimp needs a mission statement.
It already has one
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign#product_vision
Alexandre
Micahel Grosberg wrote:
I believe Gimp's target audience should be the home user and amateur
photographer, and future development in this direction should take precedence
over features for the professional artist.
Could I object? Currently GIMP is one and the only potential free OS
tool
GIMPsters,
2.4 is out and I want to thank Sven, Martin and Mitch for working
with me on realising a substantial part of the select/crop tools
specification.
For me the transition into the 2.6 development cycle also marks
the start of where working on the UI revamp of GIMP will be
more strategic,
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 05:37 -0700, Micahel Grosberg wrote:
As for user-visible changes in version 2.6, I think an important goal
should be to get Gimp to work well with the desktop environment. I'm
talking about the multiple taskbar buttons and related subjects. I'm
writing this on
Micahel Grosberg wrote:
I believe Gimp's target audience should be the home user and amateur
photographer, and future development in this direction should take
precedence over features for the professional artist.
First of all, sorry by the caveman's english.
I'm a professional artist and I
My congratulations as well, great to see the release out!
From: peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From my UI-redesign point of view, we need to get GEGL and Cairo
in GIMP, else there is little chance of innovation in the UI.
Also what the GIMP project needs right now is a short ( 6 months)
peter sikking wrote:
GIMPsters,
Half of the select/crop tools is still to-be-implemented, part
of it (narrow situation) needs further specification and hmmm,
Cairo is introduced. I say lets finish the select/crop tools
making full use cairo, like transparency.
Hello
I have already started
Choi, Ji-Hui wrote:
Hi, list
At first, I have to apologize you all
I don't know whom I should ask about this.
if I'm wrong, please tell me the correct mailing address.
I want to translate the introduce page of gimp 2.4.0 in gimp.org
this page, http://gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.4.html
Damien wrote:
Gimp 4.0 seems to bug in fullscreen mode with fluxbox. When I zoom an
image, the background window follows the image dimensions instead of freeze.
I can't test the bug with another WM.
I love gimp 4.0 and the new gimp website ! :-)
Regards.
--
Damien
Hello
It's GIMP
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:02 -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
(I also think that the first GEGL-based release should be called 3.0.)
There will most likely be zero user-visible changes or new features due
to the port of the core to GEGL. It would be very stupid to make that a
major release. We
Go for the low-hanging fruit. Do whatever work is easiest that can roll into
new releases. If GEGL is toughest, leave that until 2nd, and do the GDK stuff
first. Do whatever you have the strongest team for.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On 10/27/07, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That page is maintained by the GIMP developers and I see no problem with
you translating and hosting a version of that page by yourself.
Thank you for your kindly reply, Martin.
:-)
--
〓〓
Choi, Ji-Hui
So... Gimp currently has 4 major goals?
- Cairo
- GEGL
- Add named parameters and default values to the PDB
- 6 months development cycle.
Wouldn't it be easier to treat them as Separate goals for separate
releases? Once Cairo and GEGL (I have no idea for the Parameters feature,
so apologies for
On 10/27/07, Valerie VK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... Gimp currently has 4 major goals?
- Cairo
- GEGL
- Add named parameters and default values to the PDB
- 6 months development cycle.
Wouldn't it be easier to treat them as Separate goals for separate
releases? Once Cairo and GEGL (I
22 matches
Mail list logo
