On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:45:35PM -0400, Benjamin Turner wrote:
I re ran the individual test 20 times, re ran the fs mark test suite 10
times, and re ran the whole fs sanity test suite again and was unable to
reproduce.
Many thanks for running these tests!
Niels
-b
On Tue, Jun 17,
On 06/18/2014 10:13 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/18/2014 10:11 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 06/18/2014 10:04 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/18/2014 09:39 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
Pranith,
Regression test mentioned in $SUBJECT failed (testcase : 14 16)
Console log
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:49:26AM -0400, Shyamsundar Ranganathan wrote:
You maybe looking at the problem being fixed here, [1].
On a lookup attribute mismatch was not being healed across
directories, and this patch attempts to address the same. Currently
the version of the patch does not
I have several patches queued up for 3.6, which have all passed
regression tests. Unfortunately, they're all in areas where our
resources are pretty thin, so getting the required +1 reviews
is proving to be a challenge. The patches are as follows:
* For heterogeneous bricks [1]
A frustrating aspect of Linux is the complexity of /etc configuration file's
formats (rsyslog.conf, logrotate, cron, yum repo files, etc) In that spirit I
would simplify the select in the data classification proposal (copied below)
to only accept a list of bricks/sub-tiers with wild-cards '*',
A frustrating aspect of Linux is the complexity of /etc configuration file's
formats (rsyslog.conf, logrotate, cron, yum repo files, etc) In that spirit
I would simplify the select in the data classification proposal (copied
below) to only accept a list of bricks/sub-tiers with wild-cards '*',
Rather than using the keyword unclaimed, my instinct was to explicitly list
which bricks have not been claimed. Perhaps you have something more subtle
in mind, it is not apparent to me from your response. Can you provide an
example of why it is necessary and a list could not be provided in its
Jeff,
Comments inlined.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:53:53 PM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Plea for reviews
I have several patches queued up for 3.6, which have all passed
regression
Also navigate http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.2/
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
humble.deva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
You can fetch sources from
http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/
--Humble
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:57
