Re: [Gluster-devel] A new approach to solve Geo-replication ACTIVE/PASSIVE switching in distributed replicate setup!

2015-02-26 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Hi All, We chose fcntl over sanlock as self healing of locks is being implemented. Patch is up for review. http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9759/ Thanks and Regards, Kotresh H R - Original Message - From: Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com To: gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

2015-02-26 Thread Justin Clift
On 26 Feb 2015, at 09:55, Kiran Patil ki...@fractalio.com wrote: Hi, Currently I am aware of Gluster Regression Test suite. I would like to know if there is a Test suite which covers the Functionality of Glusterfs. If not then what are the options do we have to come up with Functional

Re: [Gluster-devel] Richacls

2015-02-26 Thread Justin Clift
On 26 Feb 2015, at 15:54, Andreas Gruenbacher agrue...@redhat.com wrote: snip I've posted an updated version of the richacl kernel patches and user-space bits earlier today [1]. This should give anyone interested in the topic a chance to get richacls up and running locally, on ext4, Is this

Re: [Gluster-devel] Richacls

2015-02-26 Thread Andreas Grünbacher
2015-02-26 17:21 GMT+01:00 Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org: Is this kind of thing suitable for XFS too? Sure, ext4 is just the first file system supported. Andreas ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

2015-02-26 Thread M S Vishwanath Bhat
On 26 February 2015 at 18:50, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote: On 26 Feb 2015, at 09:55, Kiran Patil ki...@fractalio.com wrote: Hi, Currently I am aware of Gluster Regression Test suite. I would like to know if there is a Test suite which covers the Functionality of Glusterfs.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Richacls

2015-02-26 Thread Niels de Vos
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:54:42PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: Hi everyone, I've posted an updated version of the richacl kernel patches and user-space bits earlier today [1]. This should give anyone interested in the topic a chance to get richacls up and running locally, on ext4, to

[Gluster-devel] Functional Test Suite of Glusterfs

2015-02-26 Thread Kiran Patil
Hi, Currently I am aware of Gluster Regression Test suite. I would like to know if there is a Test suite which covers the Functionality of Glusterfs. If not then what are the options do we have to come up with Functional test suite. The only option we have right now is to use Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression host hung on tests/basic/afr/split-brain-healing.t

2015-02-26 Thread Justin Clift
On 26 Feb 2015, at 08:57, Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/26/2015 02:54 AM, Justin Clift wrote: Anyone have an interest in a regression test VM that's (presently) hung on tests/basic/afr/split-brain-healing.t? Likely to be a spurious error. I can either reboot the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression host hung on tests/basic/afr/split-brain-healing.t

2015-02-26 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 02/26/2015 02:54 AM, Justin Clift wrote: Anyone have an interest in a regression test VM that's (presently) hung on tests/basic/afr/split-brain-healing.t? Likely to be a spurious error. I can either reboot the VM and put it back into service, or I can leave it for someone to log into and

[Gluster-devel] 4.0 meeting minutes

2015-02-26 Thread Jeff Darcy
Just concluded. Logs are here: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-02-26/gluster-meeting.2015-02-26-11.05.log.html Meeting summary Roll call (jdarcy, 11:05:46) Current status (jdarcy, 11:06:33) New business (and plans) (jdarcy, 11:22:14) ACTION: jdarcy to start discussion

[Gluster-devel] How do I replace a failed brick

2015-02-26 Thread Cary Tsai
Assume I have 4 bricks in a replica (count=2) volume: Volume Name: data-vol Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Brick1: 192.168.1.101/brick Brick2: 192.168.1.102/brick Brick3: 192.168.1.103/brick Brick4: 192.168.1.104/brick Something happens to Brick3 and I want to replace it by 192.168.1.105/brick