Re: [Gluster-devel] How does read-subvol-entry.t works?

2015-03-03 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:47:15AM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: If the afr xattrs on the dir is clean on all bricks, then the dir is chosen by afr_read_subvol_select_by_policy(). It seems there is very weird stuff going on there: it fails because in afr_inode_refresh_subvol_cbk (after a

[Gluster-devel] GSoC-2015 organization application rejected

2015-03-03 Thread Kaushal M
Hi everyone. I'm disappointed to announce that our application to be a mentoring organization for GSoC-2015 has been rejected. Google has accepted 137 organizations [1] this year (down from 190 last year) and couldn't find place to accommodate us. The main reason behind the rejection was the

[Gluster-devel] Spurious failure report for master branch - 2015-03-03

2015-03-03 Thread Justin Clift
Ran 20 x regression tests on our GlusterFS master branch code as of a few hours ago, commit 95d5e60afb29aedc29909340e7564d54a6a247c2. 5 of them were successful (25%), 15 of them failed in various ways (75%). We need to get this down to about 5% or less (preferably 0%), as it's killing our

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failure report for master branch - 2015-03-03

2015-03-03 Thread Justin Clift
Thanks. :) If you need a VM setup in Rackspace for you to investigate on, it's easy to do. Let me know if so. :) + Justin On 4 Mar 2015, at 04:37, Nithya Balachandran nbala...@redhat.com wrote: I'll take a look at tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t Regards, Nithya - Original

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failure report for master branch - 2015-03-03

2015-03-03 Thread Poornima Gurusiddaiah
Few more test cases causing spurious failures: ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t Failed test: 69 ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t Failed test: 69 ./tests/bugs/disperse/bug-1187474.t Failed tests: 11-12 ./tests/basic/ec/nfs.t Failed test: 9 The above failures were seen for the patches which were

Re: [Gluster-devel] How does read-subvol-entry.t works?

2015-03-03 Thread Ravishankar N
On 03/04/2015 10:29 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote: It seems there is very weird stuff going on there: it fails because in afr_inode_refresh_subvol_cbk (after a lookup), we have a valid reply from brick 0 with op_ret = 0. But the brick 0 server process was

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failure report for master branch - 2015-03-03

2015-03-03 Thread Nithya Balachandran
I'll take a look at tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t Regards, Nithya - Original Message - From: Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Wednesday, 4 March, 2015 9:57:00 AM Subject: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failure report for master branch -

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failure report for master branch - 2015-03-03

2015-03-03 Thread Nithya Balachandran
Looks like I will need a VM - the test passes consistently on my local setup. Can you please send me the details? Regards, Nithya - Original Message - From: Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org To: Nithya Balachandran nbala...@redhat.com Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: