On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:26:40AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
I still don't understand why http://review.gluster.org/10109 is working.
Does anyone know the reason? How are you guys re-creating the crash? I ran
crypt.t but no crashes on my laptop. Could some one help me re-create this
On 04/01/2015 03:27 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
crypt.t was recently broken in NetBSD regression. The glusterfs returns
a node with file type invalid to FUSE, and that breaks the test.
After running a git bisect, I found the offending commit after which
this behavior appeared:
This question was originally asked by me in the review. I was thinking
if replace brick nature is always commit force in nature then why not to
just abandon the parameters, Admin needs to be cautious enough about its
usage by any means.
~Atin
On 04/03/2015 11:17 AM, Gaurav Garg wrote:
Hi all,
On 04/02/2015 06:43 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 2 Apr 2015, at 14:08, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:21:57PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 31 Mar 2015, at 08:15, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:20:19PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
How about
Gluster : Redefine storage
~Atin
On 04/01/2015 05:44 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Hello Gluster Ant People!
Right now, if you go to gluster.org, you see our current slogan in giant
text:
Write once, read everywhere
However, no one seems to be super-excited about that slogan.
