On 06/10/2015 03:24 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
I would like to propose Aravinda (avish...@redhat.com) as a maintainer
for Geo-replication. I can act as a backup maintainer in his absence.
Hope it's not too late for this proposal.
Thanks for the consideration Venky. I think it would be apt to
On 06/10/2015 02:58 PM, Sergio Traldi wrote:
On 06/10/2015 10:27 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
Hi all,
I two servers with 3.7.1 and have the same problem of this issue:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user/20693
My servers packages:
# rpm -qa | grep gluster |
I would expect the snapshot-scheduler feature to be maintained by the
proposed snapshot maintainer for now.
IIUC volume-snapshot (glusterd mainly), USS and snapshot-scheduler (python
based)
all fall into snapshot maintenance.
I am also not a major fan of a single component being managed
Hi all,
I two servers with 3.7.1 and have the same problem of this issue:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user/20693
My servers packages:
# rpm -qa | grep gluster | sort
glusterfs-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
Hi,
I am getting devrpm failure and smoke failures for the patch
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11139/. The failures are of the nature
that the test itself doesn't initiate. For example:
http://build.gluster.org/job/glusterfs-devrpms-el7/2527/console
I tried to re-trigger just these tests,
On 06/10/2015 05:32 PM, Tiemen Ruiten wrote:
Hello Atin,
We are running 3.7.0 on our storage nodes and suffer from the same issue.
Is it safe to perform the same command or should we first upgrade to 3.7.1?
You should upgrade to 3.7.1
On 10 June 2015 at 13:45, Atin Mukherjee
I would like to propose Aravinda (avish...@redhat.com) as a maintainer
for Geo-replication. I can act as a backup maintainer in his absence.
Hope it's not too late for this proposal.
-Venky
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
To supplement our
On 06/10/2015 01:45 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
gluster volume set all cluster.op-version 30701
Hi Atin,
thanks for your answer.
I try the command you gave me but I have an error:
# gluster volume set all cluster.op-version 30701
volume set: failed: Required op_version (30701) is not
On 06/10/2015 07:25 PM, Sergio Traldi wrote:
On 06/10/2015 01:45 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
gluster volume set all cluster.op-version 30701
Hi Atin,
thanks for your answer.
I try the command you gave me but I have an error:
# gluster volume set all cluster.op-version 30701
volume
Hi,
On 06/10/2015 04:17 PM, Tiemen Ruiten wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, max op-version is still 30700, since this change
wasn't merged into 3.7.1:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10975/
see also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225999
I set the cluster.op-version 30700 without
Hi,
Can you please merge the following patches:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11087/
Regards,
Avra
On 06/09/2015 08:06 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Thanks KP :)
On 06/09/2015 07:51 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11042/
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11100/
Hi,
Can you please merge the following patches:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11087/
Avra,
I think you should maintain the snapshot scheduler feature
and shouldn't depend on me as a glusterd maintainer, for
merging changes. I am not really maintaining snapshot scheduler
in any sense of
I've tried to collect everyone's input from the previous round, and focus the
discussion a little. The result is here.
https://goo.gl/dCAO36
If you have an interest in how the next generation of DHT will work, please
join the conversation. In particular, maintainers for closely related
Hi,
In the current implementation of access-control translator, it takes
care of the following :
a.) conversion of acl xattr - gluster supported posix-acl format
(at the backend acl is stored as xattr know as system.posix_acl* for linux)
b.) Cache that posix-acl in its context.
c.) And
If I'm not mistaken, max op-version is still 30700, since this change
wasn't merged into 3.7.1:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10975/
see also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225999
On 10 June 2015 at 16:09, Atin Mukherjee amukh...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/10/2015 07:25 PM,
Hello Atin,
We are running 3.7.0 on our storage nodes and suffer from the same issue.
Is it safe to perform the same command or should we first upgrade to 3.7.1?
On 10 June 2015 at 13:45, Atin Mukherjee amukh...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/10/2015 02:58 PM, Sergio Traldi wrote:
On 06/10/2015
Hi,
Could you please merge the following patch:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11139/
Regards,
Avra
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:42:27PM +0530, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
Hi,
In the current implementation of access-control translator, it takes care
of the following :
a.) conversion of acl xattr - gluster supported posix-acl format
(at the backend acl is stored as xattr know as
+gluster-devel
On 06/11/2015 10:22 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
Could you guys help in finding RCA for
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/10449/consoleFull
failures in tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-963541.t
Pranith
I'm unable to push a patch on release-3.6, getting different errors
every time:
[ravi@tuxpad glusterfs]$ ./rfc.sh
[detached HEAD a59646a] afr: honour selfheal enable/disable volume set
options
Date: Sat May 30 10:23:33 2015 +0530
3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create
Last time when this happened Kaushal/vijay fixed it if I remember correctly.
+kaushal +Vijay
Pranith
On 06/11/2015 10:38 AM, Anoop C S wrote:
On 06/11/2015 10:33 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
I'm unable to push a patch on release-3.6, getting different
errors every time:
This happens for master
- Original Message -
From: Ravishankar N ravishan...@redhat.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:33:54 AM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Unable to send patches to gerrit
I'm unable to push a patch on release-3.6, getting different errors every
On 06/11/2015 10:33 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
I'm unable to push a patch on release-3.6, getting different
errors every time:
This happens for master too. I continuously get the following error:
error: unpack failed: error No space left on device
[ravi@tuxpad glusterfs]$ ./rfc.sh
+Adding gluster-infra
On 06/11/2015 10:39 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Last time when this happened Kaushal/vijay fixed it if I remember
correctly.
+kaushal +Vijay
Pranith
On 06/11/2015 10:38 AM, Anoop C S wrote:
On 06/11/2015 10:33 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
I'm unable to push a patch
On 06/11/2015 04:29 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:42:27PM +0530, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
Hi,
In the current implementation of access-control translator, it takes care
of the following :
a.) conversion of acl xattr - gluster supported posix-acl format
(at the backend
Hi,
New patches being submitted are not getting NetBSD regressions run on
them. Even manually they are not getting triggered. Is anyone aware of this?
Regards,
Avra
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 06:53:39PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
I am getting devrpm failure and smoke failures for the patch
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11139/. The failures are of the nature that
the test itself doesn't initiate. For example:
27 matches
Mail list logo
