On 06/25/2015 09:00 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/25/2015 02:49 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
It knows which bricks are up/down. But they may not be the latest. Will
that matter?
AFAIK it's sufficient at this point to know which are up/down.
In that case, we need two functions which
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote:
At the Gluster Summit, everyone agreed that GlusterD should be the
first component to be targeted for GlusterFS-4.0. We had good
discussions on what GlusterD lacks currently and what is required for
GlusterD-2.0. KP and I
On 06/25/2015 12:53 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
hi,
Does anyone know why glusterfs hangs with valgrind?
/proc/pid/stack ?
That was giving futex_wait() CPU shoots up to 100%
Pranith
Pranith
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thursday 25 June 2015 07:13 AM, Mohamed Ashiq Liyazudeen wrote:
Hi,
There is a core created while building the patch, the failure is not
related to my patch. can anyone look into
It seems that the patch has not been correctly committed into master. I
see it as merged in gerrit, but doing a 'git pull' on master on a local
repository doesn't seem to include it.
Am I doing something wrong ?
It also seems that a recently rebased patch is still failing because of
the same
Hi,
There is a core created while building the patch, the failure is not related to
my patch. can anyone look into
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11353/console
--
Regards,
Mohamed Ashiq.L
___
Gluster-devel mailing
- Original Message -
From: Sachin Pandit span...@redhat.com
To: Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.es
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org, Raghavendra G
raghaven...@gluster.com
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:50:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel]
On Thursday 25 June 2015 07:13 AM, Mohamed Ashiq Liyazudeen wrote:
Hi,
There is a core created while building the patch, the failure is not related to
my patch. can anyone look into
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11353/console
Since core files and the
Hi Xavier,
I did a git pull and I could see the commit
01e42f25ebdc44847e8b1dce02f7fd486b40dbc2
in my repository. This commit is the revert of the commit
8ab6608accb62d6320d1fc1fbe651fcafd376270
~ Sachin.
- Original Message -
From: Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.es
To:
I would like to present this problem in a different context, than
solving this with a meta data server approach, and also state some of
the ongoing efforts, and wish list items, to address problems of this
nature (hence the top post).
Comments welcome! (there is a lot of hand waving below BTW
Sorry, my bad. I didn't see an error while doing the pull on my local
repository and I thought it was updated while it wasn't.
Xavi
On 06/25/2015 02:26 PM, Sachin Pandit wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sachin Pandit span...@redhat.com
To: Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.es
Hi, everyone!
Nowadays, there are three issues confusing me recently when I used the
glusterfs to save huge datas. Like below: 1) Is there any reason for
reserving 10% free space of each brick in the volume ? And Can I do not reserve
the 10% freespace of
hi,
I merged a patch before a dependent patch by mistake which lead to
build failure. Merged http://review.gluster.com/11413 to fix the same.
Pranith
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
Kaushal,
This is really cool stuff! I think Heketi will provide the IVC service
Glusterd-2.0 requires. I also look forward to working with you and KP if you
guys have the time (and anyone else who want to help, for that matter). Just
letting you know, that at least until October, Heketi
Ok, Thanks. I have re-triggered it.
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
To: Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com, Gluster Devel
gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 11:55:22 AM
This is a known spurious failure.
Pranith
On 06/25/2015 11:14 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
Hi,
I see the above test case failing for my patch which is not related.
Could some one from AFR team look into it?
- Original Message -
From: Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 11:14:42 AM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Regresssion Failure (3.7 branch):
afr-quota-xattr-mdata-heal.t
Hi,
I see the above
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote:
One other design characteristic I can think of is to have GlusterD-2.0
be able to make best use of Nodes based on the Node topology, not sure
if this is covered by any other feature below ?
IOW, admin should be able
On 06/25/2015 12:10 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
On 06/25/2015 09:00 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 06/25/2015 02:49 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
It knows which bricks are up/down. But they may not be the latest.
Will
that matter?
AFAIK it's sufficient at this point to know which are
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
hi,
Does anyone know why glusterfs hangs with valgrind?
/proc/pid/stack ?
Pranith
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
I tried EC volume with 2+1 config. dd of=a.txt if=/dev/urandom bs=128k
count=1024 worked fine. When I increased bs=1M it hung. This is on my
laptop.
Pranith
On 06/25/2015 10:32 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
- Original Message -
hi,
Does anyone know why glusterfs hangs with
One other design characteristic I can think of is to have GlusterD-2.0
be able to make best use of Nodes based on the Node topology, not sure
if this is covered by any other feature below ?
IOW, admin should be able to provide a hierarchy of how nodes are
provisioned
(rack, site, zone,
Thank you very much :)
Xavi
On 06/24/2015 08:21 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Hi All,
I request you to re-base your patch which are failed regression with
test-case bug-1153964.t
Thanks,
Vijay
On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:42 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11362/
Hi Niels,
Patch# 11022 is not available downstream 3.1.
Patch# 11361 is a blocker for 3.1 and depends on ref-count functions, is
it possible to backport patch #11022 to downstream?
Thanks,
Vijay
On Tuesday 23 June 2015 06:26 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:30:39PM +0530,
24 matches
Mail list logo
