On 07/08/2015 03:57 PM, Anuradha Talur wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 3:42:12 PM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failures again
I've been hitting spurious failures in Linux
Hi All,
In about 30 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 12:00 UTC, 14:00 CEST, 17:30 IST
(in your terminal, run: date -d 12:00 UTC)
- agenda:
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 03:42 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
I've been hitting spurious failures in Linux regression runs for my change [1].
The following tests failed,
./tests/basic/afr/replace-brick-self-heal.t [2]
./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1238508-self-heal.t [3]
I've been hitting spurious failures in Linux regression runs for my change [1].
The following tests failed,
./tests/basic/afr/replace-brick-self-heal.t [2]
./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1238508-self-heal.t [3]
./tests/bugs/quota/afr-quota-xattr-mdata-heal.t [4]
./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1235182.t [5]
- Original Message -
From: Nithya Balachandran nbala...@redhat.com
To: Vijaikumar M vmall...@redhat.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 12:17:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Testcase '/tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1109889.t'
failing
On 07/08/2015 12:06 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
On 07/08/2015 11:42 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Adding the correct gluster-devel id.
Regards,
Raghavendra Bhat
On 07/08/2015 11:38 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Hi,
In bit-rot feature, the scrubber marks the corrupted (objects whose
data has
On 07/07/2015 12:30 PM, Raghavendra G wrote:
+ vijay mallikarjuna for quotad has similar concerns
+ Raghavendra Bhat for snapd might've similar concerns.
Snapd also uses protocol/server at the top of the graph. So the fix for
protocol/server should be good enough.
Regards,
Raghavendra Bhat
- Original Message -
From: Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 3:42:12 PM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failures again
I've been hitting spurious failures in Linux regression runs for my change
[1].
The
*Top posting with summary of mails above to enable better discussion*
*Premise of original mail:*
* Gluster related documentation was spread across
wiki/website-html/gluster-repo and difficult to find.
* We want a new place for documentation(preferebly one single place)
* The workflow to
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:28:06PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hi All,
In about 30 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 12:00 UTC, 14:00 CEST, 17:30 IST
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 03:53 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 03:42 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
I've been hitting spurious failures in Linux regression runs for my
change [1].
The following tests failed,
./tests/basic/afr/replace-brick-self-heal.t [2]
My suggestions:
* Differentiate between user doc(installation, administration, feature
summary, tools, FAQ/troubleshooting etc) and developer doc(Design doc,
developer workflow, coding guidelines etc).
I think there's a third category: feature/release planning and tracking. That
stuff
Ya sure will look into this issue.
Regards,
Gaurav
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Fernandes josfe...@redhat.com
To: Gaurav Garg gg...@redhat.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org, Atin Mukherjee
amukh...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 10:51:07 PM
Subject: Spurious
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:32:46AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
My suggestions:
* Differentiate between user doc(installation, administration, feature
summary, tools, FAQ/troubleshooting etc) and developer doc(Design doc,
developer workflow, coding guidelines etc).
I think there's a third
I think our linux regression is again unstable. I am seeing at least 10
such test cases ( if not more) which have failed. I think we should again
start maintaining an etherpad page (probably the same earlier one) and keep
track of them otherwise it will be difficult to track what is fixed and
Gluster devs,
I'm running gluster v3.6.3 (both server and client side). Since my
application requires more than 32 groups, I don't mount with ACLs on the
client. If I mount with ACLs between the bricks and set a default ACL on
the server, I think I'm right in stating that the server should
Also failing on:
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/12069/consoleFull
Regards,
Nithya
- Original Message -
From: Vijaikumar M vmall...@redhat.com
To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org, Avra Sengupta
aseng...@redhat.com, Rajesh Joseph
Adding the correct gluster-devel id.
Regards,
Raghavendra Bhat
On 07/08/2015 11:38 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Hi,
In bit-rot feature, the scrubber marks the corrupted (objects whose
data has gone bad) as bad objects (via extended attribute). If the
volume is a replicate volume and a
On 07/08/2015 11:42 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Adding the correct gluster-devel id.
Regards,
Raghavendra Bhat
On 07/08/2015 11:38 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Hi,
In bit-rot feature, the scrubber marks the corrupted (objects whose
data has gone bad) as bad objects (via extended
On 07/08/2015 11:16 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
I think our linux regression is again unstable. I am seeing at least
10 such test cases ( if not more) which have failed. I think we should
again start maintaining an etherpad page (probably the same earlier
one) and keep track of them
Sent a patch for this yesterday. http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11579/.
Could someone please take this in
Regards,
Avra
On 07/08/2015 08:31 PM, Joseph Fernandes wrote:
Hit again ! :(
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/12098/consoleFull
for my patch
The following console output complains of missing tools,
snip
The following required tools are missing:
* dbench
* mock
* nfs-utils
* yajl
* xfsprogs
Please install them and try again.
snip
This was observed on nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org.
For more information, see
CC Prasanna who will be looking into it.
On 07/06/2015 07:30 PM, Josh Boon wrote:
Hey folks,
Does anyone have test environment running Ubuntu 14.04, QEMU 2.0, and
Gluster 3.6.3? I'm looking to have some folks test out QEMU 2.3 for
stability and performance and see if it removes the segfault
Hi joseph,
By looking at bt it seems that rebalance process have crashed.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0040e825 in glusterfs_rebalance_event_notify_cbk
(req=0x7ff25000497c, iov=0x7ff26ed905e0, count=1, myframe=0x7ff25000175c)
at
- Original Message -
From: Vijaikumar M vmall...@redhat.com
To: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com, Sachin Pandit
span...@redhat.com, Gluster Devel
gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 10:50:12 PM
Subject: Re: spurious regression failure in
25 matches
Mail list logo
