Hi Amogha,
You can find pre-commit regression tests in the tests/ directory of the
gluster source tree. These tests are run before any commit gets merged
into the repository.
We are in the process of populating distaf [1] with post-commit
regression tests. Details on performance tests can
Hi,
Facing NETBSD Regression errors - mount-nfs-auth.t
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/10899/consoleFull
for patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12326/
Kindly help.
--
Saravana
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
- Original Message -
> October 14 2015 3:11 PM, "Manoj Pillai" wrote:
> > E.g. 3x number of bricks could be a problem if workload has
> > operations that don't scale well with brick count.
>
> Fortunately we have DHT2 to address that.
>
> > Plus the brick
> >
Probably a good question on gluster-users (CCed)
Pranith
On 10/14/2015 03:57 AM, Brian Lahoue wrote:
Has anyone tested backing up a fairly large Gluster implementation
with Amanda/ZManda recently?
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Hi,
We are building application that use opensource DFS products like Ceph,
GlusterFS.
While going through the web materials for DFS I learnt regression testing
run on GlusterFS. I wanted to understand the tests run by the QA team
before the GFS is released to oustide world(more specifically I
To date my experience with upgrades has been a disaster in that in two
cases I was unable to start my volume and eventually I had to downgrade.
What I want to recommend is that there is an EXTENSIVE REGRESSION TEST.
The most important goal is that NOTHING that works with the previous
release
One feature I would like to see in 4.0 is to be able to have a volume
started with only ONE brick up and running, at least as a configurable
option if not a default.
This was possible in 3.5, perhaps more by mistake than design, but it
disappeared in 3.6 and it is a major issue if I want to run a
Hi,
We are evaluating GlusterFS for deployment with our product.
While going through the web materials for DFS I learnt regression testing
run on GlusterFS. I wanted to understand the tests run by the QA team
before the GFS is released to oustide world(more specifically I need the
following)
Has anyone tested backing up a fairly large Gluster implementation with
Amanda/ZManda recently?
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
One feature I would like to see in 4.0 is to be able to have a volume
started with only ONE brick up and running, at least as a configurable
option if not a default.
This was possible in 3.5, perhaps more by mistake than design, but it
disappeared in 3.6 and it is a major issue if I want to run a
To date my experience with upgrades has been a disaster in that in two
cases I was unable to start my volume and eventually I had to downgrade.
What I want to recommend is that there is an EXTENSIVE REGRESSION TEST.
The most important goal is that NOTHING that works with the previous
release
11 matches
Mail list logo