Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] VM fs becomes read only when one gluster node goes down

Thanks for the hints guys :-) I think i will try to use an arbiter. As i use distributed / replicated volumes i think i have to add 2 arbiters, right? My nodes have 10GBit interfaces. Would be 1 GBit for the arbiter(s) enough? Regards André Am 28.10.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Diego Remolina: > I

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD and NetBSD builds failing on master

On November 2, 2015 at 12:09:45 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus (m...@netbsd.org) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:50:25AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > I should have caught this problem (mea culpa) but ?break the world? is a > > bit hyperbolic. ?The world? is broken much of the time, because very > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD and NetBSD builds failing on master

On Monday 02 November 2015 03:41 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:19:48PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: Hi All, Recently merged patch "debug/io-stats: Add FOP sampling feature" [1] has a hard coded path for log directory and I think *BSD machines have a different path for

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD and NetBSD builds failing on master

Jeff Darcy wrote: > None of us can keep up with the change stream. :( What's the best way > to ask, in your case? Add you as a reviewer within Gerrit? Separate > email? Anything else that would maximize efficiency when people ask for > help? Well an e-mail is fine. Being

[Gluster-devel] (late) report from SDC 2015

September 19 through September 25, several developers from Red Hat Storage were in Santa Clara, CA, attending and presenting at SNIA's Storage Developer Conference (SDC), and also participating in the colocated SMB plugfest. For the Samba community, this is one of the two major events of the year

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD and NetBSD builds failing on master

> Generally speaking, I am in favor of backing otu changes that > break the world. I should have caught this problem (mea culpa) but “break the world” is a bit hyperbolic.  “The world” is broken much of the time, because very few of the developers on this project know how to fix *BSD portability

Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious failure in ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t

Thanks Gaurav, Xavi is already looking into it. Meanwhile a patch to mark it bad test is already posted for review: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12481/ Pranith On 11/02/2015 06:21 PM, Gaurav Garg wrote: Hi ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t test case. seems to be spurious failure in ec

[Gluster-devel] spurious failure in ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t

Hi ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t test case. seems to be spurious failure in ec https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/15395/consoleFull https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/15388/consoleFull

Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious failure in ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t

- Original Message - From: "Gaurav Garg" To: "Gluster Devel" Cc: "Ashish Pandey" Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 6:21:55 PM Subject: [Gluster-devel] spurious failure in ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t Hi