On 12/08/2015 09:02 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 12/08/2015 02:53 AM, Shyam wrote:
Hi,
Why not think along the lines of new FOPs like fop_compound(_cbk)
where, the inargs to this FOP is a list of FOPs to execute (either in
order or any order)?
That is the intent. The question is
>
> On 12/08/2015 09:02 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/08/2015 02:53 AM, Shyam wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Why not think along the lines of new FOPs like fop_compound(_cbk)
> >> where, the inargs to this FOP is a list of FOPs to execute (either in
> >> order or any order)?
> >
Hi,
I've been trying to build/install 3.7.6 from the source tarball onto
FreeBSD and have had some luck.
I basically needed to apply this little patch:
--- cli/src/Makefile.in.sav 2015-12-06 17:06:59.252807000 -0500
+++ cli/src/Makefile.in 2015-12-06 17:07:44.741783000 -0500
@@ -63,8 +63,8
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:18:08PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> Do you mind adding gluster-users to that thread? It would be nice to know
> what are the problems they ran into to fix them.
If you have some anwsers, go there and cross-post with gluster-users...
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hello
In case nobody noticed, there is ongoing discussion on the dovecot
mailing list about using glusterfs as mail storage. Some poeple
ran into trouble and I think knowledgable hints would be of great
value there.
NB: I did not dare to attempt such a setup, regardless of how
appealing it is.
hi,
Draft of the design doc:
Main motivation for the design of this feature is to reduce network
round trips by sending more
than one fop in a network operation, preferably without introducing new
rpcs.
There are new 2 new xlators compound-fop-sender, compound-fop-receiver.
Hi all,
This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
( https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
Hi,
Created a tool to simplify the manual steps involved in Geo-replication
session creation(Previously known as georepsetup[1]) and enhancements to
status command.
Posted the patch for review[2], Refer README.md[3] for documentation.
Please review. Thanks.
Comments & Suggestions Welcome.
Do you mind adding gluster-users to that thread? It would be nice to
know what are the problems they ran into to fix them.
Pranith
On 12/07/2015 03:44 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hello
In case nobody noticed, there is ongoing discussion on the dovecot
mailing list about using glusterfs as
FYI: tests/basic/tier/record-metadata-heat.t failed in
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16562/consoleFull
triggered for
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12830/
I can see no relation.
(In fact, that patch should not add any new failures.)
Michael
signature.asc
Here is a failure of sparse-file-self-heal.t:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16561/consoleFull
triggered by http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12826/
I can't see how this is related.
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/07/2015 06:51 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 12/07/2015 06:47 PM, Michael Adam wrote:
FYI: tests/basic/tier/record-metadata-heat.t failed in
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16562/consoleFull
triggered for
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12830/
I can see no
On 12/07/2015 08:42 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> to avoid an undefined reference for xdr_auth_glusterfs_parms_v2.
> (I also found that building without libxml2 doesn't work, because fields
> #if HAVE_LIB_XML are used in the code. Maybe it would be nicer if configure
> failed when libxml2 isn't
Ok, after I did autogen.sh before configure, the build did make the
shared libraries. (The patch I posted in the last email wasn't needed,
since library ordering won't matter for shared libs. It must have been
trying to do static linking without doing autogen.sh.)
It fails near the end of "make
> Looks like the run failed due to:
>
> /tests/bugs/fuse/bug-924726.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20 Failed: 1)
>Failed test: 20
>
> Raghavendra - this test has been reported previously too as affecting
> other regression runs. Can you please take a look in as you are the
> original author of this
15 matches
Mail list logo
