Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

On 2016-01-08 at 12:03 +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Top posting, this is a very old thread. > > Keeping in view the recent NetBSD problems and the number of bugs creeping > in, I suggest we do these things right now: > > a. Change the gerrit merge type to fast forward only. > As explained

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD hang in quota-anon-fd-nfs.t

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0530, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote: > All quota test-cases uses 'tests/basic/quota.c' to write data > Does sync flags have any impact? It seems to change internal behavior but not the result, I can still see write calls taking e.g.: 1169s For the sake of

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

I have made changes to fix the lookup leak in a different way (as discussed with Pranith) and uploaded them in the latest patch set #4 - http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13096/ Please check if it resolves the mem leak and hopefully doesn't result in any assertion :) Thanks, Soumya On

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

On Jan 12, 2016 2:50 AM, "Niels de Vos" wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:46:09PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Kaushal M wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

Niels de Vos wrote: > How would we handle patches that get sent by maintainers? Most > developers that do code reviews will only +1 those changes. Those will > never get automatically regression tested then. I dont think a > maintainer should +2 their own patch immediately

[Gluster-devel] freebsd smoke failure

I've been observing freebsd smoke failure for all the patches for last few days with the following error: mkdir: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster: Permission denied mkdir: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster: Permission denied Can any one from infra team can help here?

Re: [Gluster-devel] freebsd smoke failure

On 12/01/16 11:19, Atin Mukherjee wrote: I've been observing freebsd smoke failure for all the patches for last few days with the following error: mkdir: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster: Permission denied mkdir: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gluster: Permission denied

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

On Jan 12, 2016 3:44 AM, "Michael Adam" wrote: > > On 2016-01-08 at 12:03 +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Top posting, this is a very old thread. > > > > Keeping in view the recent NetBSD problems and the number of bugs creeping > > in, I suggest we do these things right now:

Re: [Gluster-devel] GFID to Path Conversion

regards Aravinda On 01/11/2016 08:00 PM, Shyam wrote: On 01/06/2016 04:46 AM, Aravinda wrote: regards Aravinda On 01/06/2016 02:49 AM, Shyam wrote: On 12/09/2015 12:47 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, Sharing draft design for GFID to Path Conversion.(Directory GFID to Path is very easy in DHT

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

On 01/11/2016 05:11 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: Brief test shows that Ganesha stopped leaking and crashing, so it seems to be good for me. Thanks for checking. Nevertheless, back to my original question: what about FUSE client? It is still leaking despite all the fixes applied. Should

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > To: "Michael Adam" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:46:05 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

Just in case, here is Valgrind output on FUSE client with 3.7.6 + API-related patches we discussed before: https://gist.github.com/cd6605ca19734c1496a4 12.01.2016 08:24, Soumya Koduri написав: For fuse client, I tried vfs drop_caches as suggested by Vijay in an earlier mail. Though all the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review, submit type and Jenkins testing

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:46:09PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Raghavendra Talur >

[Gluster-devel] 3.8 Plan changes - proposal

Hi All, We discussed the following proposal for 3.8 in the maintainers mailing list and there was general consensus about the changes being a step in the right direction. Would like to hear your thoughts about the same. Changes to 3.8 Plan: 1. Include 4.0 features such

[Gluster-devel] Force lookup if inode ctx is not present for master xlators.

Hi All, We are facing an issue where inode_ctx is missing for some of the xlators, even though inode was already linked to inode table. This can happen if the inode was linked from any xlators which is loaded below master xlator. A similar problem was reported in bug 1297311

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Memory leak in GlusterFS FUSE client

Brief test shows that Ganesha stopped leaking and crashing, so it seems to be good for me. Nevertheless, back to my original question: what about FUSE client? It is still leaking despite all the fixes applied. Should it be considered another issue? 11.01.2016 12:26, Soumya Koduri написав:

Re: [Gluster-devel] GFID to Path Conversion

On 01/06/2016 04:46 AM, Aravinda wrote: regards Aravinda On 01/06/2016 02:49 AM, Shyam wrote: On 12/09/2015 12:47 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, Sharing draft design for GFID to Path Conversion.(Directory GFID to Path is very easy in DHT v.1, this design may not work in case of DHT 2.0) (current

Re: [Gluster-devel] GFID to Path Conversion

On 01/05/2016 08:24 PM, Venky Shankar wrote: Shyam wrote: On 12/09/2015 12:47 AM, Aravinda wrote: Hi, Sharing draft design for GFID to Path Conversion.(Directory GFID to Path is very easy in DHT v.1, this design may not work in case of DHT 2.0) (current thought) DHT2 would extend the