Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Determining Connected Client Version

On 01/27/2016 12:49 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On 01/27/2016 12:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> >> >> On 01/27/2016 09:21 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>> >>> On 01/27/2016 07:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 01/26/2016 01:19 PM, Marc Eisenbarth wrote: > I'm trying to set a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Possible spurious test tests/bitrot/br-stub.t

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:51:56AM -0500, Sakshi Bansal wrote: > Hi Venky, > > Patch #13262 is failing for the above tests. The patch is just calling > STACK_DESTROY at appropriate place to avoid rebalance crashing. The test is > not rebalance related so the failure looks spurious to me.

[Gluster-devel] self-heald.t test failures

Hi, tests/basic/afr-self-heald.t seems to be consistently failing. One such failing regression is here[1]. It is failing with some other patches as well. Could you please have a look on it? [1] https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/13895/consoleFull -- Thanks &

Re: [Gluster-devel] Possible spurious test tests/bitrot/br-stub.t

I will have a look at it! Thanks and Regards, Kotresh H R - Original Message - > From: "Venky Shankar" > To: "Sakshi Bansal" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Kotresh Hiremath > Ravishankar" > Sent:

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

On 02/03/2016 09:20 AM, Shyam wrote: On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: Background: Quick-read + open-behind xlators are developed to help in small file workload reads like apache webserver, tar etc to get the data of the file in lookup FOP itself. What happens is, when a

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

- Original Message - > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > To: "Jeff Darcy" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 7:52:25 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client leaks summary — part I

Hi Oleksandr, On 01/02/16 19:28, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: Please take a look at updated test results. Test: find /mnt/volume -type d RAM usage after "find" finishes: ~ 10.8G (see "ps" output [1]). Statedump after "find" finishes: [2]. Then I did drop_caches, and RAM usage dropped to ~4.7G

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: Background: Quick-read + open-behind xlators are developed to help in small file workload reads like apache webserver, tar etc to get the data of the file in lookup FOP itself. What happens is, when a lookup FOP is executed, GF_CONTENT_KEY is

[Gluster-devel] REMINDER: Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting at 12:00 UTC (~in 90 minutes)

Hi all, This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more about, or assisting with the Bug Triage. Meeting details: - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC (https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting ) - date: every Tuesday - time: 12:00 UTC

Re: [Gluster-devel] Volume usage mismatch problem

Hi, The size was not immediately updated because the accounting process done by marker happens asynchronously and it will take some in updating the size. Also, you have mentioned the size got updated after an ls command. Probably, the problem could be an fsync(flushing) that could have failed at

Re: [Gluster-devel] Losing connection to bricks, Gluster processes restarting

Not historically, but we are using bonding for replication between the servers. It's been stable for at least 6 months, but it's possible that one of the links in the bond is failing or something. Would this type of restart be triggered by a loss of communication between bricks in a replica set?

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Quota list not reflecting disk usage

Hi Steve, As you have mentioned, if you are using a glusterfs version lesser than 3.7, then you are doing it right. We are sorry to say but unfortunately that's the only way(manually going and cleaning up the xattr's before enabling quota or wait for the process to complete itself, which would

[Gluster-devel] Contributing to Gluster

Hi Gluster-Devs, My name is Willy. I am a final year undergraduate student from Bandung Institute of Technology. My final year project is about Gluster. After I researched for a while about Gluster, I would like to take the task about working on lookup-self heal

[Gluster-devel] [CANCELED] Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting on 2nd Feb, 2015.

Hi all, The Gluster Community Bug Triage Meeting for today is canceled because of less number of participants. Expecting more participants for next week's bug triage meeting. -- Thanks & Regards, Manikandan Selvaganesh. - Original Message - From: "Manikandan Selvaganesh"

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

On 02/03/2016 11:49 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 02/03/2016 09:20 AM, Shyam wrote: On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: Background: Quick-read + open-behind xlators are developed to help in small file workload reads like apache webserver, tar etc to get the data of

Re: [Gluster-devel] Possible spurious test tests/bitrot/br-stub.t

Hi I looked into it, it is a nfs mount failure and not related to bitrot. The logs say [2016-02-02 06:42:30.6N]:++ G_LOG:./tests/bitrot/br-stub.t: TEST: 31 31 mount_nfs nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org:/patchy /mnt/nfs/0 nolock ++ [2016-02-02 06:42:30.264734] W [MSGID: 114031]

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

On 02/02/2016 06:22 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: Background: Quick-read + open-behind xlators are developed to help in small file workload reads like apache webserver, tar etc to get the data of the file in lookup FOP itself. What happens is, when a lookup FOP is executed, GF_CONTENT_KEY is

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client leaks summary — part I

02.02.2016 10:07, Xavier Hernandez написав: Could it be memory used by Valgrind itself to track glusterfs' memory usage ? Could you repeat the test without Valgrind and see if the memory usage after dropping caches returns to low values ? Yup. Here are the results: === pf@server:~ » ps aux

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

> Background: Quick-read + open-behind xlators are developed to help > in small file workload reads like apache webserver, tar etc to get the > data of the file in lookup FOP itself. What happens is, when a lookup > FOP is executed, GF_CONTENT_KEY is added in xdata with max-length and >

[Gluster-devel] Losing connection to bricks, Gluster processes restarting

We're running a fairly large 2-replica volume across two servers. The volume is approximately 20TB of small 1K-4MB files. The volume is exported via NFS, and mounted remotely by two clients. For the past few weeks the Gluster brick processes have been randomly restarting. Luckily they've been

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Trashcan issue with vim editor

Hi, Thanks Anoop for the help, Would you please tell me when can we expect this new release with this bug fix. Thanks & Reagrds On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Anoop C S wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 15:25 +0530, PankaJ Singh wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We are using

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFS FUSE client leaks summary — part I

Will those patches be available in 3.7.7? On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > > > On 02/01/2016 02:48 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 01/02/16 09:54, Soumya Koduri wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 02/01/2016 01:39 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFS FUSE client leaks summary — part I

- Original Message - > From: "Serkan Çoban" > > Will those patches be available in 3.7.7? 3.7.7 was released yesterday, so no. But 3.7.7 has another issue; there won't be packages available from download.gluster.org. Pranith has already indicated that we will