[Gluster-devel] Fuse Subdirectory mounts, access-control

2016-03-02 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Hi, This mail explains the initial design about how this will happen. Administrators are going to create a directory on the volume with normal fuse-mount(Or any other mounts) let's call it 'subdir1'. Administrator will create auth-allow/reject options with the ip/addresses he chooses to

Re: [Gluster-devel] REST API authentication: JWT - Shared Token vs Shared Secret

2016-03-02 Thread Luis Pabon
Hi Aravinda, Very good summary. I would like to rephrase a few parts. On the shared token approach, the disadvantage is that the server will be more complicated (not *really* complicated, just more than the shared token), because it would need a login mechanism. Server would have to both

Re: [Gluster-devel] Updating Maintainers Guide

2016-03-02 Thread Atin Mukherjee
Few comments/suggestions from my side: 1. Under the section of "Guidelines that Maintainers are expected to adhere to" point 3 describes the following: "The responsibility of merging a patch into a release branch in normal circumstances will be that of the release maintainer's. Only in

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

2016-03-02 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Yes, because I updated from patch set 2 to 3 and tests for 2 were running > on the same slave. It seems my test for concurent runs misfires when previous run was aborted. I need to improve that. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz

Re: [Gluster-devel] Cores generated with ./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t

2016-03-02 Thread Raghavendra G
Hi Soumya, Can you send a fix to this regression on upstream master too? This patch is merged there. regards, Raghavendra On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < khire...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Soumya, > > I analysed the issue and found out that crash has happened

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

2016-03-02 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On Mar 3, 2016 7:42 AM, "Emmanuel Dreyfus" wrote: > > Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > > The tests passed on the first run itself, except for the NetBSD with > > "another test running on slave" error. > > Was the previous test on the slave canceled? Yes, because

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

2016-03-02 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Raghavendra Talur wrote: > The tests passed on the first run itself, except for the NetBSD with > "another test running on slave" error. Was the previous test on the slave canceled? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

2016-03-02 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:30:24PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Any comments before I merge the patch > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13393/ ? > > The proposal has the merit of adressing the multi-OS case, but

Re: [Gluster-devel] Handling locks in NSR

2016-03-02 Thread Shyam
On 03/02/2016 03:10 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, All fops in NSR, follow a specific workflow as described in this UML(https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lxwox72n6ovfOwzmdlNCZBJ5vQcCaONvZva0aLWKUqk/edit?usp=sharing). However all locking fops will follow a slightly different workflow as

[Gluster-devel] Meeting minutes of the Gluster Community Weekly Meeting - 02/Mar/2016

2016-03-02 Thread Kaushal M
IMPORTANT: Next weeks meeting will be held at 1500UTC instead of the normal time. This is part of our trialing rotating schedules for meeting. I've attached a calendar invite for next weeks meeting to this mail. The meeting minutes of this week are available at the following locations, * Minutes:

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Gluster Community Meeting - 02/Mar/2016

2016-03-02 Thread Kaushal M
Hi All, This weeks weekly meeting will be held in #gluster-meeting on freenode, in about 1 hour from now (1200UTC). This was supposed to be the first meeting in which we tried out the proposed rotating schedule (1200UTC/1500UTC). But this change wasn't communicated well, so we'll start the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Handling locks in NSR

2016-03-02 Thread Rajesh Joseph
- Original Message - > From: "Atin Mukherjee" > To: "Avra Sengupta" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 4:03:11 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Handling locks in NSR > > > > > > -Atin

Re: [Gluster-devel] Handling locks in NSR

2016-03-02 Thread Atin Mukherjee
-Atin Sent from one plus one On 02-Mar-2016 1:40 pm, "Avra Sengupta" wrote: > > Hi, > > All fops in NSR, follow a specific workflow as described in this UML( https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lxwox72n6ovfOwzmdlNCZBJ5vQcCaONvZva0aLWKUqk/edit?usp=sharing). However all

Re: [Gluster-devel] REST API authentication: JWT - Shared Token vs Shared Secret

2016-03-02 Thread Atin Mukherjee
-Atin Sent from one plus one On 02-Mar-2016 12:23 pm, "Aravinda" wrote: > > Hi, > > For Gluster REST project we are planning to use JSON Web Token for > authentication. There are two approaches to use JWT, please help us to > evaluate between these two options. > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Handling locks in NSR

2016-03-02 Thread Venky Shankar
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:29:26PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: > On 03/02/2016 02:02 PM, Venky Shankar wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:40:08PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>All fops in NSR, follow a specific workflow as described in this >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Handling locks in NSR

2016-03-02 Thread Avra Sengupta
On 03/02/2016 02:02 PM, Venky Shankar wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:40:08PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, All fops in NSR, follow a specific workflow as described in this UML(https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lxwox72n6ovfOwzmdlNCZBJ5vQcCaONvZva0aLWKUqk/edit?usp=sharing). However