Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

2016-04-22 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > To: "Vijay Bellur" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 11:34:35 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

2016-04-22 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:16:48AM +0530, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: ... > >> But the problem comes when we use gf_api, where we don't have any > >> control over client behavior. So to fix this issue we have to give stat > >> information for all the entries. > >> > > Apart from Samba, what other

Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

2016-04-22 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
- Original Message - > From: "Vijay Bellur" > To: "Mohammed Rafi K C" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 9:41:34 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator > > On

Re: [Gluster-devel] Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

2016-04-22 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > comments are inline. > > On 04/22/2016 09:41 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C >> wrote: >>> But the problem comes when we use gf_api, where we don't

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature - 22/04/2016

2016-04-22 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
Hi all, This week's status: -Tested the program with different modes of retention and by setting different values for the retention profile -Uploaded the test case (worm.t) with the patch -Updated the WORM design-specs -Written blogs about the Semantics of WORM/Retention and WORM on Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] freebsd-smoke failures

2016-04-22 Thread Polakis Vaggelis
thx for the support! by the way same problem also occurs in review http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14045/ br, vangelis On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le mardi 19 avril 2016 à 09:58 -0400, Jeff Darcy a écrit : >> > So can a workable solution be

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core generated by trash.t

2016-04-22 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
+Krutika - Original Message - > From: "Anoop C S" > To: "Atin Mukherjee" > Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Ravishankar N" > , "Anuradha Talur" > , gluster-devel@gluster.org > Sent:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core generated by trash.t

2016-04-22 Thread Anoop C S
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 16:24 +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I should have said the regression link is irrelevant here. Try > running > this test on your local setup multiple times on mainline. I do > believe > you should see the crash. > I could see coredump on running trash.t multiple times in a