Hi Milind,
Are the bricks lvm mounterd bricks. This field is populated for lvm
mounted bricks, and used by them. For regular bricks, which don't have a
mount point this valus is ignored.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/04/2016 07:44 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
glusterd_get_brick_mount_dir () does a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> I think we should compare n-1th week report with nth and any common tests
> out of that comparison having more than or equal to 3 instances of failures
> SHOULD immediately marked as bad and any component having more
Thanks Pranith,
I am waiting for RPMs to show, I will do the tests as soon as possible
and inform you.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On
glusterd_get_brick_mount_dir () does a brick_dir++ which seems to cause
this problem and removing this line fixes the problem. Commit f846e54b
introduced it.
Ccing Avra/Rajesh
mount_dir is used by snapshot, however I am just wondering how are we
surviving this case.
~Atin
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016
On 08/04/2016 05:40 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/04/2016 08:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
...
./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times
Regression
On 08/04/2016 08:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>
> ...
>>> ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times
>>> Regression Links:
>>>
here's one of the brick definition files for a volume named "twoXtwo"
[root@f24node0 bricks]# cat f24node1\:-glustervols-twoXtwo-dir
hostname=f24node1
path=/glustervols/twoXtwo/dir
real_path=/glustervols/twoXtwo/dir
listen-port=0
rdma.listen-port=0
decommissioned=0
brick-id=twoXtwo-client-1
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
...
> > ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times
> > Regression Links:
> > https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/1423/consoleFull
>
> I
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:47:04AM -0400, Prashanth Pai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The official python bindings to libgfapi has been around for a while now
> in it's source repo[1] and the API documentation[2] is also up. However,
> it wasn't made available over regular release channels until now and
Hi all,
The official python bindings to libgfapi has been around for a while now
in it's source repo[1] and the API documentation[2] is also up. However,
it wasn't made available over regular release channels until now and users
had to install it from source (which is very easy[3] for Python
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> Thanks Pranith,
> I am waiting for RPMs to show, I will do the tests as soon as possible
> and inform you.
>
I guess on 3.7.x the RPMs are not automatically built. Let me find how it
can be done. I will inform you
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>> [Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for
>> extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary]
>>
>> Found cores:
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo