On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:20:56PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Our regression jobs are currently named the following:
> >
> > * rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered
> > *
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:34:24PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:19:10AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07:22AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> >> > I'd like to propose
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As *we* all are aware, striped volumes should not be used anymore. The
> replacement for this is sharding, available and stable since the latest
> 3.7 releases and 3.8. Unfortunately users still create striped
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:19:10AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07:22AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> > I'd like to propose renaming them to:
>> > * centos-regression
>> > * netbsd-regression
The Red Hat Gluster Storage documentation team and I had a conversation
about how we can our upstream documentation more consistent and improved
for our users, and they're willing to work with us to find where the major
gaps are in our documentation. This is awesome! But it's going to take some
I can wait for the patch to complete, please inform me when you ready.
If it will take too much time to solve the crawl issue I can test
without it too...
Serkan
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Serkan
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote:
> I can wait for the patch to complete, please inform me when you ready.
> If it will take too much time to solve the crawl issue I can test
> without it too...
>
I don't know the Root cause for the problem, so I am not
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:19:10AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07:22AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > I'd like to propose renaming them to:
> > * centos-regression
> > * netbsd-regression
>
> I suggest you keep an OS version number;
> netbsd7-regression
>
> That way
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:14:34PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know, 3.6 will be EOLed once 3.9 is released. But we still have
> a lot of bugs open on 3.6.x [1]. We need to screen these bugs and
> close/clone these as required.
>
> In yesterday's community meeting, we decided to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07:22AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> I'd like to propose renaming them to:
> * centos-regression
> * netbsd-regression
I suggest you keep an OS version number;
netbsd7-regression
That way we can introduce an OS update as experimental without breaking
what is known to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know, 3.6 will be EOLed once 3.9 is released. But we still have
> a lot of bugs open on 3.6.x [1]. We need to screen these bugs and
> close/clone these as required.
>
> In yesterday's community meeting,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Our regression jobs are currently named the following:
>
> * rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered
> * rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered
>
> I'd like to propose renaming them to:
>
> * centos-regression
>
Hi all,
As you know, 3.6 will be EOLed once 3.9 is released. But we still have
a lot of bugs open on 3.6.x [1]. We need to screen these bugs and
close/clone these as required.
In yesterday's community meeting, we decided to have this screening
after the Bug-triage meeting next week. All
Hi All,
The meeting minutes and logs for this weeks meeting are available at
the links below.
- Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-08-10/weekly_community_meeting_10aug2016.2016-08-10-12.00.html
- Minutes (text):
14 matches
Mail list logo