On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/08/2016 3:45 AM, Diego Remolina wrote:
>
>> The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade
>> glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There
>> was also a
In keeping with Fedora, oVirt and some of our other communities with
vibrant content, I'm extending a new proposal around how we can create more
content that gets published on blog.gluster.org.
Here's some new guidelines patterned after those:
## Make Your Proposal
When you are ready to create
On 19/08/2016 3:45 AM, Diego Remolina wrote:
The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade
glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There
was also a post from someone about it recently on the list and I do
not think it got any replies.
I would
The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade
glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There
was also a post from someone about it recently on the list and I do
not think it got any replies.
Diego
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Joe Julian
On 08/18/2016 01:22 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a
"lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for
On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a
"lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for quite
some time (eol of April 2019).
What's
I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a
"lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for quite
some time (eol of April 2019).
___
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:39:40PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi Poornima, Dan -
>
> Let us have a hangout/bluejeans session this week to discuss the planned
> md-cache improvements, proposed timelines and sort out open questions if
> any.
>
> Would 11:00 UTC on Wednesday work for everyone in
Er, typo. That was supposed to say netbsd7-regression :)
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:07:08PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > As in the case of CentOS yesterday, the NetBSD job is now
> netbsd6-regression.
>
> But we run
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:07:08PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> As in the case of CentOS yesterday, the NetBSD job is now netbsd6-regression.
But we run regressions o nnetbsd-7 branch. Smoke tests are tun on neybsd-6.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
Hello,
As in the case of CentOS yesterday, the NetBSD job is now netbsd6-regression.
The old job is still around so there's no broken links. I'll delete the old job
in about 3 months when the logs aren't relevant anymore.
--
nigelb
___
Gluster-devel
11 matches
Mail list logo