Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Regression Testing

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > I would also recommend running perf-test.sh [1] for regression. > Would it be useful to have this script maintained as part of the Gluster organization? Improvements/changes could perhaps be more easily tracked. > [1]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:18:05PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > > We've > > only added people. For security

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Testing

On 08/29/2016 08:25 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: Hello folks, I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we can do upstream. Niels today solved

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > We've > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the > following: > > If you do not have a commit in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Regression Testing

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:55:00PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >> > > Hello folks, >> > > >> > >

[Gluster-devel] release checklist for 3.9.0

hi, Could we have release checklist for the components? Please add the steps that need to be done before the release is made at this link: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist. This activity needs to be completed by 2nd September. Please also add if the tests

[Gluster-devel] counters in tiering / request for comments

Below is a write-up on tiering counters (bz 1275917) I give three options, and I think option (1) and (3) are doable. (2) is harder and would need more discussion. Currently counters give limited information on tiering behavior. They are just a raw count of the number of files moved each

[Gluster-devel] [Fwd: [Gluster-infra] Reboot of jenkins/gerrit for upgrade and snapshot]

Forwarding, because coffee didn't reach my brain yet -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS --- Begin Message --- Hi, so since the release is on the 30, I was wondering if people would be ok with a small (less than 1h) downtime for upgrade and snapshot of the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Testing

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we > can do upstream. Niels today solved half my problem by pointing out that we > can > get physical nodes on CentOS CI. The general idea is

[Gluster-devel] Regular Performance Testing

Hello folks, I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we can do upstream. Niels today solved half my problem by pointing out that we can get physical nodes on CentOS CI. The general idea is to run iozone[1] and smallfile[2] on a fixed frequency for master (to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Profiling GlusterFS FUSE client with Valgrind's Massif tool

More info here. Massif puts the following warning on volume unmount: === valgrind: m_mallocfree.c:304 (get_bszB_as_is): Assertion 'bszB_lo == bszB_hi' failed. valgrind: Heap block lo/hi size mismatch: lo = 1, hi = 0. This is probably caused by your program erroneously writing past the end of

[Gluster-devel] Profiling GlusterFS FUSE client with Valgrind's Massif tool

Hello. While dancing around huge memory consumption by FUSE client [1], I was suggested by Pranith to use Massif tool to find out the reason of the leak. Unfortunately, it does not work for me properly, and I believe I do something wrong. Instead of generating report after unmounting

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:48:46AM -0400, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > Updated inline. > > - Original Message - ... > > > > 3) Md-cache perf improvements in smb: > > > > > > > > > Feature owner: Poornima > > > > > > > Feature undergoing review. It will be in tech-preview

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:45:01AM -0400, Prashanth Pai wrote: > > > -Prashanth Pai > > - Original Message - > > From: "Soumya Koduri" > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Rajesh Joseph" > > , "Manikandan Selvaganesh" > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On 08/26/2016 09:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. Please respond with: 1) Feature already merged 2) Undergoing review will make it by 31st Aug 3)

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > hi, > Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), > want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. > > Please respond with: > 1) Feature already merged > 2) Undergoing

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > We've > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the > following: > > If you do not have a commit in

[Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

Hello folks, We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. We've only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the following: If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, your membership from gluster-maintainers team on Gerrit will be

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

-Prashanth Pai - Original Message - > From: "Soumya Koduri" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Rajesh Joseph" > , "Manikandan Selvaganesh" > , "Csaba Henk" , "Niels de Vos" >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Though its a bit late, here is one from me: Topic: "DHT: current design, (dis)advantages, challenges - A perspective" Agenda: I'll try to address * the why's, (dis)advantages of current design. As noted in the title, this is my own perspective I've gathered while working on DHT. We don't have

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On 08/26/2016 09:39 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: hi, Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), want to get a sense if any of

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On 08/26/2016 09:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. Please respond with: 1) Feature already merged 2) Undergoing review will make it by 31st Aug 3)