Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] NetBSD aborted runs

I am seeing a pause when the .t runs that seem to last close to how much ever time we put in EXPECT_WITHIN [2016-09-01 03:24:21.852744] I [common.c:1134:pl_does_monkey_want_stuck_lock] 0-patchy-locks: stuck lock [2016-09-01 03:24:21.852775] W [inodelk.c:659:pl_inode_setlk] 0-patchy-locks: MONKEY

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On 2016-08-26 at 21:38 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), > want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. > > Please respond with: > 1) Feature already merged > 2) Undergoing review will make it by

[Gluster-devel] Status of block and object storage on gluster(integration with containers as well)

hi, I will be sending status of this work every week. This is first mail of this work. We are enhancing these interfaces primarily for container storage - From gluster a container will be able to export a file as virtual block and will be used as private storage for that container,

Re: [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Hi, I would like to propose a lightning talk/ignite session. Running distaf/glusto tests in CentOS CI environment. I would like like to talk about the plans to make distaf/glusto run on CentOS CI, current status and the work pending there. If I could send pending patches before the summit, I

[Gluster-devel] Multiplexing status, August 31

(This is as much for my own reference as anything, but there seems to be a decent chance that others might be interested) The good news is that almost all of the tests in tests/basic, except for those related to problematic features (see below) pass now. Two of the AFR tests fail sporadically

[Gluster-devel] adding smoke test to catch printf-style format string errors

Hi, FYI, we are adding a new smoke test that builds on a 32-bit platform to catch printf-style format string errors. We have cleaned up these errors in the past, but they're creeping in again in new code and fixes. The test will start out as a non-voting test. After we get the source cleaned

Re: [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

I have one more talk to propose: Deterministic Releases and How to Get There Our release process needs to less about communication and more about "Are we confident this release is good". The path to get there is long and involves a lot of work. I'd like to talk about my rough ideas, get feedback,

[Gluster-devel] Running strfmt as smoke test

Hello, Kaleb has pointed out that the number of failures here are creeping up. I've suggested we run this as a smoke test. It's going to fail all the time at first, so I propose it be a non-voting test for now. Once we get master in a good shape, we can turn on voting for this job. Does that

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

I've given the flags. The change can be merged now. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Aravinda wrote: > +1 > > regards > Aravinda > > On Wednesday 31 August 2016 04:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able > to debug the issue yet. > It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines > or that there is a bug in

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

+1 regards Aravinda On Wednesday 31 August 2016 04:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: Hi All, We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able to debug the issue yet. It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines or that there is a bug in

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able > to debug the issue yet. > It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines > or that there is a bug in

[Gluster-devel] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

Hi All, We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able to debug the issue yet. It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines or that there is a bug in the brick code. However, as we have 3.9 merge deadline tomorrow this is causing the test

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Hi, I 'd like to talk about: Title : Gluster and Bareos Integration - Opensource Backup solution Theme : Experience - Description of real world experience and feedback from: b> Developers integrating Gluster with other ecosystems Agenda Planned: - Bareos

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Sounds great! I had to knit together different cli commands in the past for 'gstatus' to provide a view of the cluster - so this is a cool. Would it be possible to add an example of the output to the RFE BZ* 1353156 * *?* Paul C On Wed, Aug

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Hi all, I'd like to propose the following talk for Gluster Developer Summit 2016. Title: How an external application looking to integrate with Gluster can use the CLI to get the state of a cluster Theme: Experience (Developers integrating Gluster with other ecosystems) Gluster 3.9 will have

[Gluster-devel] Bug Triage meeting log

Hello, Here are the log of yesterday Gluster Community Bug Triage Meeting. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-08-30/gluster_community_bug_triage_meeting.2016-08-30-12.00.html Minutes (text):