Hi Xavi/Kaleb/Pranith,
During few of our older conversations (like [1], but not only one), some of you
had reported that the thread which writes invalidation notifications (of
inodes, entries) to /dev/fuse terminates spuriously. Csaba tried to reproduce
the issue, but without success. It would
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 11:42:06 PM
> Subject: Checklist for perf xlator components for upstream
Again inode/fd leaks and memory consumption should be one of the tests (just as
fuse-bridge)
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Niels de Vos" , "Shyam Ranganathan"
>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Checking for inode/fd leaks should be top priority. We have seen a bunch of
high memory consumption issues recently. [1] is first step towards that.
[1] http://review.gluster.org/15318
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Niels de Vos"
Thanks Pranith. I'll let you know by early next week.
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 12:20:03 AM
>
We will provide the tests by early next week.
On Saturday 3 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
> hi,
> Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
> before doing a release for glusterd component? Could you let me know who
> will be
hi,
As per MAINTAINERS file this port doesn't have maintainer. If you want
to take up the responsibility of maintaining the port please let us know
how you want to go about doing it and what should be the checklist of
things that should be done before every release upstream. It is extremely
hi,
As per MAINTAINERS file this port doesn't have maintainer. If you want
to take up the responsibility of maintaining the port please let us know
how you want to go about doing it and what should be the checklist of
things that should be done before every release upstream. It is extremely
hi,
In the past we have had issues where some of the functionality didn't
work on debian/ubuntu because 'glfsheal' binary was not packaged. What do
you guys as packaging/build maintainers on different distros suggest that
we do to make sure we catch such mistakes before the releases are
hi Jay,
Are there any tests that are done before releasing glusterfs upstream
to make sure the plugin is stable? Could you let us know the process, so
that we can add it to
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Pranith
Thanks Raghavendra, once you guys are done, please update that you guys are
done with the checklist.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Raghavendra Talur
wrote:
> I have edited the etherpad with some tests. Please review and add other
> things you recommend.
>
> Thanks,
>
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the gluster-swift integration
tests that need to be run before doing an upstream gluster release? Could
you let me know who will be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
Niels,
Does wireshark also handle new fops like seek, compond, getactivelk,
setactivelk FOPS? What are the other things that you check before the
release?
We can update more at
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Pranith
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the nfs-ganesha integrations
tests that need to be run before doing an upstream gluster release? Could
you let me know who will be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
hi Aravinda,
I think the existing tests should be good enough to test this
functionality but I could be wrong. May be we should update
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist if we
need anymore things to be added.
--
Aravinda & Pranith
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
before doing a release for snapshot component? Could you let me know who
will be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Aravinda & Pranith
hi,
I think this should be covered as part of other component testing,
but if you think any more tests need to be added, please let us know.
I can update it at
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Aravinda & Pranith
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
before doing a release for glusterd component? Could you let me know who
will be providing with the list?
I think just the cases that cover the infra part should be good enough.
Component based commands should come in
hi,
I think most of this testing will be covered in nfsv4, smb testing.
But I could be wrong. Could you let me know who will be providing with the
list if you think there are more tests that need to be run?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
before doing a release for Upcall component? Could you let me know who will
be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Aravinda & Pranith
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
before doing a release for Quota+Marker component?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Aravinda & Pranith
___
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
before doing a release for FUSE bridge component? Could you let me know who
will be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Aravinda & Pranith
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
> before doing a release for Bitrot component? Could you let me know who will
> be providing with the list?
>
> I can update it
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi Raghavendra,
>I feel running https://github.com/avati/perf-
> test/blob/master/perf-test.sh is good enough for testing these. Do you
> feel anything more needs to be done before the release?
>
> I
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
> before doing a release for DHT component? Could you let me know who will be
> providing with the list?
>
> I can update it at
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be
> done before doing a release for georep family of components? Could you let
> me know who will be providing with the list?
>
> I
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
>Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be
> done before doing a release for Tier component? Could you let me know who
> will be providing with the list?
>
> I can update
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be
done before doing a release for Tier component? Could you let me know who
will be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Pranith
hi Raghavendra,
I feel running
https://github.com/avati/perf-test/blob/master/perf-test.sh is good enough
for testing these. Do you feel anything more needs to be done before the
release?
I can update it at
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Pranith
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done
before doing a release for Bitrot component? Could you let me know who will
be providing with the list?
I can update it at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/
gluster-component-release-checklist
--
Pranith
hi,
Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be
done before doing a release for georep family of components? Could you let
me know who will be providing with the list?
I think changelog, marker, georep are the features that should come under
this bucket right? Are
Both changes have regression runs in progress [1][2]. As they should
be fixing the failures being seen, I'd like to see the runs completed.
If the current runs fail, we can decide what to to do.
~kaushal
[1] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/496/
[2]
Hi,
Currently the master and 3.9 regression is broken. This is because we do not
have regression
run just before merge(rebase). Patches http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15385/ and
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15386 fixes the same, Is it possible to merge
these patches
at the earliest, as they
Hi,
Release 3.9 branch created yesterday. Thanks to all who contributed
features and bug fixes for 3.9.
Please backport non feature patches to Release-3.9 as well.
Next steps:
- Release-3.9 branch stabilization for GA
- Tests coverage for the features
- RC builds for testing
- Documentation
34 matches
Mail list logo