Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:56:39AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:01:18AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > > hi Bharata, > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Review request for lock migration patches

Gentle reminder for reviews. Thanks, Susant - Original Message - > From: "Susant Palai" > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > > Cc: "gluster-devel" > Sent: Tuesday, 30 August,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for gluster-swift for upstream release

> > > hi, > > > Did you get a chance to decide on the gluster-swift integration > > > tests that need to be run before doing an upstream gluster release? Could > > > you let me know who will be providing with the list? > > > > The tests (unit test and functional test) can be run before

Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: > > > Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that > didn't > > make it to 3.9.0? We

Re: [Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that didn't > make it to 3.9.0? We have some features that missed deadlines twice as well, > i.e. planned for 3.8.0 and didn't make it and planned

[Gluster-devel] Post mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0

hi, Do you think it makes sense to do post-mortem of features that didn't make it to 3.9.0? We have some features that missed deadlines twice as well, i.e. planned for 3.8.0 and didn't make it and planned for 3.9.0 and didn't make it. So may be we are adding features to roadmap without

Re: [Gluster-devel] md-cache changes and impact on tiering

- Original Message - > From: "Dan Lambright" > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" > Cc: "Nithya Balachandran" , "Gluster Devel" > > Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 10:01:36 AM > Subject: Re: md-cache

Re: [Gluster-devel] Profiling GlusterFS FUSE client with Valgrind's Massif tool

Created BZ for it [1]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373630 On вівторок, 6 вересня 2016 р. 23:32:51 EEST Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > I included you on a thread on users, let us see if he can help you out. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko < > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for gluster-swift for upstream release

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Prashanth Pai wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > > To: tdasi...@redhat.com, "Prashanth Pai" > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > > Sent:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for snapshot component for upstream release

Thanks Avra, added the list to etherpad. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote: > Hi Pranith, > > The following set of automated and manual tests need to pass before doing > a release for snapshot component: > 1. The entire snapshot regression suite present in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for gfapi for upstream release

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:10:41AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > > I think most of this testing will be covered in nfsv4, smb > testing. > > But I could be wrong. Could you let me know who will be

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for GlusterFS Hadoop HCFS plugin for upstream release

Thanks for this information. We will follow up on this one. On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Jay Vyas wrote: > Hi pranith; > > The bigtop smoke tests are a good way to go. You can run them against > pig hive and so on. > > In general running a simple mapreduce job like

Re: [Gluster-devel] Mistake in regression-test-burn-in

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > I made a mistake in configuring regression-test-burn-in jobs. They've been > running from the same revision ever since I converted them to JJB. I've fixed > this up today, so it shouldn't happen again. I'm

Re: [Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain Mac-OSX port of gluster?

On 09/06/2016 08:03 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:30:08AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Mac OS X doesn't build at the present time because its sed utility (used in the xdrgen/rpcgen part of the build) doesn't support the (linux compatible) '-r' command line option.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain Mac-OSX port of gluster?

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:30:08AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Mac OS X doesn't build at the present time because its sed utility (used in > the xdrgen/rpcgen part of the build) doesn't support the (linux compatible) > '-r' command line option. (NetBSD and FreeBSD do.) > > (There's an easy

[Gluster-devel] Traige meeting

Hi Gluster team, The weekly Gluster bug triage is about to take place in 26 min. Meeting details: - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC ( https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting ) - date: every Tuesday - time: 12:00 UTC (in your terminal, run: date -d

Re: [Gluster-devel] Anyone wants to maintain Mac-OSX port of gluster?

On 09/02/2016 03:49 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, As per MAINTAINERS file this port doesn't have maintainer. If you want to take up the responsibility of maintaining the port please let us know how you want to go about doing it and what should be the checklist of things that should

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for glusterfs packaging/build for upstream release

On 09/02/2016 03:40 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, In the past we have had issues where some of the functionality didn't work on debian/ubuntu because 'glfsheal' binary was not packaged. It was? That seems strange to me because our Debian packaging is less "selective" than our

[Gluster-devel] Mistake in regression-test-burn-in

Hello folks, I made a mistake in configuring regression-test-burn-in jobs. They've been running from the same revision ever since I converted them to JJB. I've fixed this up today, so it shouldn't happen again. I'm adding a post-mortem to bug 1373454 if you're curious about what went wrong. --

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Muthu Vigneshwaran > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Actually the currently component list in the Bugzilla appears to be in >> just alphabetical order of all components

[Gluster-devel] Bugs with incorrect status

1349723 (mainline) MODIFIED: Added libraries to get server_brick dictionaries [master] I904612 distaf: adding libraries to get server_brick dictionaries (MERGED) ** akhak...@redhat.com: Bug 1349723 should be ON_QA, use v3.9rc0 for verification of the fix ** 1342298 (mainline) MODIFIED:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for ganesha FSAL plugin integration testing for 3.9

CCin gluster-devel & users ML. Somehow they got missed in my earlier reply. Thanks, Soumya On 09/06/2016 12:19 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: On 09/03/2016 12:44 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi, Did you get a chance to decide on the nfs-ganesha integrations tests that need to be run

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

Hi, This is the tree structure for quota and marker(3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and mainline). | | - glusterfs || || - quota || - marker | On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Muthu Vigneshwaran

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Muthu Vigneshwaran wrote: > Hi, > > Actually the currently component list in the Bugzilla appears to be in > just alphabetical order of all components and sub-components as a flattened > list. > > Planning to better organize the component

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:01:18AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > hi Bharata, > > >What tests are run before the release of glusterfs so that we

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi Bharata, >What tests are run before the release of glusterfs so that we make > sure this integration is stable? Could you add that information here so > that I can update it at >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi Bharata, > >What tests are run before the release of glusterfs so that we make > > sure this integration is stable? Could you add that information

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:41:31PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> hi Bharata, > >>What tests are run before the release of glusterfs

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to enable FUSE kernel cache about dentry and inode?

On 09/06/2016 12:27 PM, Keiviw wrote: Could you please tell me your glusterfs version and the mount command that you have used?? My GlusterFS version is 3.3.0, different versions may be exits different results. I tried it on the master branch, on Fedora 22 virtual machines (kernel version:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for QEMU integration for upstream release

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 01:04:37AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >> hi Bharata, >>What tests are run before the release of glusterfs so that we make >> sure this integration is stable? Could you add that

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:43:06PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > > Just need a clarification. Does a "commit in the last 90 days" means > > > merging a patch sent by someone else by maintainer or maintainer sending a > > > patch to be merged? > > > > Your email needs to either be in Reviewed-By or

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to enable FUSE kernel cache about dentry and inode?

Could you please tell me your glusterfs version and the mount command that you have used?? My GlusterFS version is 3.3.0, different versions may be exits different results. At 2016-09-06 12:35:19, "Ravishankar N" wrote: That is strange. I tried the experiment on a

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious termination of fuse invalidation notifier thread

Hi Raghavendra, On 06/09/16 06:11, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: - Original Message - From: "Xavier Hernandez" To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Kaleb Keithley" , "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" Cc: "Csaba