Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS 3.9 release Schedule

2016-09-09 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Aravinda wrote: > Hi All, > > Gluster 3.9 release Schedule > > Week of Sept 12-16 - Beta Tagging and Start testing > Week of Sept 19-23 - RC tagging > End of Sept 2016 - GA(General Availability) release of 3.9 > > Considering that beta

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for Bitrot component for upstream release

2016-09-09 Thread FNU Raghavendra Manjunath
I would recommend the following tests. 1) The tests in our regression tests 2) Creating data set of many files (of different sizes) and then enabling bit-rot on the volume. 3) scrubber throttling 4) Tests such as open + write + close and again open + write + close (i.e. before the bit-rot daemon

Re: [Gluster-devel] Trash test aborted netbsd regression

2016-09-09 Thread Jiffin Tony Thottan
Hi Atin, From the console log: 01:22:55 rm: /mnt/glusterfs/0/abc/internal_op: Operation not permitted 01:22:55 rm: /mnt/glusterfs/0/abc: Directory not empty 01:22:55 mv: rename /mnt/glusterfs/0/abc to /mnt/glusterfs/0/trash: Operation not permitted 05:09:06 Build timed out (after 300

[Gluster-devel] Trash test aborted netbsd regression

2016-09-09 Thread Atin Mukherjee
http://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/634/ (I had observed same failure earlier as well but didnt have link) -- --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Gluster-devel] Gluster and FreeBSD

2016-09-09 Thread Nithya Balachandran
Hi, I recently debugged a problem [1] where linkfiles were not created properly a gluster volume created using bricks running UFS . Whenever a linkfile was created, the sticky bit was not set on it causing the same file to be listed twice. >From https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=chmod=2

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 3.9 release Schedule

2016-09-09 Thread Aravinda
Hi All, Gluster 3.9 release Schedule Week of Sept 12-16 - Beta Tagging and Start testing Week of Sept 19-23 - RC tagging End of Sept 2016 - GA(General Availability) release of 3.9 Considering that beta tagging will be done in next week, is it okay to accept any features(Which are already

Re: [Gluster-devel] Libunwind

2016-09-09 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:07:33AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote: > (1) Has somebody already gone down this path? Does it work? I recall attempting to port the Julia programming language to NetBSD, and libunwind gave me a hard time because the NetBSD does not implement an API as large as on Linux.