Re: [Gluster-devel] libgfapi zero copy write - application in samba, nfs-ganesha

2016-09-26 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
- Original Message - > From: "Ric Wheeler" > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Saravanakumar Arumugam" > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Ben Turner" > , "Ben England" >

Re: [Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

2016-09-26 Thread Nigel Babu
These are gbench failures rather than smoke failures. If you know how to debug dbench failures, please add comments on the bug and I'll get you the logs you need. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > On 09/27/2016 09:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri

Re: [Gluster-devel] libgfapi zero copy write - application in samba, nfs-ganesha

2016-09-26 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 09/27/2016 07:56 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: +Manoj, +Ben turner, +Ben England. @Perf-team, Do you think the gains are significant enough, so that smb and nfs-ganesha team can start thinking about consuming this change? regards, Raghavendra This is a large gain but I think that we

Re: [Gluster-devel] libgfapi zero copy write - application in samba, nfs-ganesha

2016-09-26 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
+Manoj, +Ben turner, +Ben England. @Perf-team, Do you think the gains are significant enough, so that smb and nfs-ganesha team can start thinking about consuming this change? regards, Raghavendra - Original Message - > From: "Saravanakumar Arumugam" > To:

Re: [Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

2016-09-26 Thread Ravishankar N
On 09/27/2016 09:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: hi Nigel, Is there already a bug to capture these in the runs when failures happen? I am not able to understand why this failure happened: https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/30843/console, logs/cores would have helped. Let me know

[Gluster-devel] logs/cores for smoke failures

2016-09-26 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
hi Nigel, Is there already a bug to capture these in the runs when failures happen? I am not able to understand why this failure happened: https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/30843/console, logs/cores would have helped. Let me know if I should raise a bug for this. -- Pranith

[Gluster-devel] Fixes for spurious failures in open-behind.t

2016-09-26 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
hi, I found the following two issues and fixed them: Problems: 1) flush-behind is on by default, so just because write completes doesn't mean it will be on the disk, it could still be in write-behind's cache. This leads to failure where if you write from one mount and

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-26 Thread Ryan Ding
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 8:59 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > >>> write-behind: implement causal ordering and other cleanup >> >>> Rules of causal ordering implemented:¬ >> >>> - If request A arrives after the acknowledgement (to the app,¬ >> >>> i.e, STACK_UNWIND) of another request

[Gluster-devel] libgfapi zero copy write - application in samba, nfs-ganesha

2016-09-26 Thread Saravanakumar Arumugam
Hi, I have carried out "basic" performance measurement with zero copy write APIs. Throughput of zero copy write is 57 MB/sec vs default write 43 MB/sec.* *( I have modified Ben England's gfapi_perf_test.c for this. Attached the same for reference ) We would like to hear how samba/

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] Migration complete

2016-09-26 Thread Jeff Darcy
> Michael and I are happy to announce that the migration is now complete. Thank you both for all of your hard work. :) ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fixing setfsuid/gid problems in posix xlator

2016-09-26 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:44:14PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > > > > > Jiffin found an interesting problem in posix xlator where we

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-26 Thread Jeff Darcy
> compatible to linux page cache will always to be a better practice > way, because there is a lot local applications that has already rely > on its semantics. I don't think users even *know* how the page cache behaves. I don't think even its developers do, in the sense of being able to define

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fixing setfsuid/gid problems in posix xlator

2016-09-26 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 08:44:14PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > > > Jiffin found an interesting problem in posix xlator where we have never > > been > > > using setfsuid/gid (

Re: [Gluster-devel] relative ordering of writes to same file from two different fds

2016-09-26 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Ryan Ding wrote: > > > On Sep 23, 2016, at 8:59 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > > > >>> write-behind: implement causal ordering and other cleanup > >> > >>> Rules of causal ordering implemented:¬ > >> > >>> - If request A

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS-3.7.16 release approaching

2016-09-26 Thread Kaushal M
Hi all, GlusterFS-3.7.16 is on target to be released on Sep 30, 4 days from now. In preparation for the release, maintainers please stop merging anymore changes into release-3.7. If any developer has a change that needs to be merged, please reply to this email before end of day Sep 28. At this