On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 08:50:12PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
...
> > Maybe we can add an additional tag that mentions all the people that
> > did do reviews of older
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:08:42PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> GlusterFS-3.7.16 is on target to be released on Sep 30, 4 days from now.
>
> In preparation for the release, maintainers please stop merging
> anymore changes into release-3.7.
> If any developer has a change that needs to
On 09/30/2016 06:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the
final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people
would spend time on
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 09:54:24PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Thank you Kaleb for putting this together. I think it would also be useful
> to list where our official container images would be present too.
I think a different page would be most useful, so that we do not
overwhelm users too much.
readdirp needs to be explicitly disabled at 3 places if I remember correctly.
At fuse mount option, at dht and at md-cache level.
-Prashanth Pai
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Gluster
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:11:51AM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> hi,
> At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the
> final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people
> would spend time on different versions making the patch better,
If you want it to happen automatically, it's next to impossible. We'll need
to fork Gerrit to make those changes.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Manikandan Selvaganesh <
manikandancs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, Pranith. I prefer adding everyone's name(who reviewed any patch set
> despite the
+1, Pranith. I prefer adding everyone's name(who reviewed any patch set
despite the latest patch set) in the 'Reviewed-by' tag.
On Sep 30, 2016 6:02 PM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
wrote:
> hi,
> At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the
> final
What if the lower xlators want to set the entry->inode to NULL and clear
the entry->d_stat to force a lookup on the name? i.e.
gfid-split-brain/ia_type mismatches.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday,
In gfapi, we pass down readdirp, irrespective of whether the application called
readdir/readdirp.
Hence the behaviour will be same for samba and Ganesha i suppose.
Regards,
Poornima
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra
Thank you Kaleb for putting this together. I think it would also be useful
to list where our official container images would be present too.
Should we make this content persistent somewhere on our website and have a
link from the release notes? The complaints that we encountered after
releasing
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When NFS-Ganesha does an UNLINK of a filename on an inode, it does a
> follow-up check to see if the inode has been deleted or if there are
> still other filenames linked (like hardlinks) to it.
>
> Users are
hi,
At the moment 'Reviewed-by' tag comes only if a +1 is given on the
final version of the patch. But for most of the patches, different people
would spend time on different versions making the patch better, they may
not get time to do the review for every version of the patch. Is it
hi,
In dht_readdirp_cbk() there is a check about skipping files without
ia_type. Could you help me understand why this check is added? There are
times when users have to delete gfid of the entries and trigger something
like 'find . | xargs stat' to heal the gfids. This case would fail if we
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" , "Nithya
dht_readdirp_cbk has different behaviour for directories and files.
1. If file, pick the dentry (passed from subvols as part of readdirp response)
if the it corresponds to data file.
2. If directory pick the dentry if readdirp response is from hashed-subvol.
In all other cases, the dentry is
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:13:15PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:52:45PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:00:40PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >
On 09/30/2016 10:08 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Does samba/gfapi/nfs-ganesha have options to disable readdirp?
AFAIK, currently there is no option to disable/enable readdirp in gfapi
& nfs-ganesha (not sure about samba). But looks like nfs-ganesha seem to
be always using readdir,
- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Pranith Kumar
> Karampuri"
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:09:34PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This an update to the previous mail about
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
> dht_readdirp_cbk has different behaviour for directories and files.
>
> 1. If file, pick the dentry (passed from subvols as part of readdirp
> response) if the it corresponds to data file.
> 2. If directory pick
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:13:15PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:52:45PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Nigel Babu
> wrote:
> > >
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:29:30AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following features are not ready or not planned for 3.9 release. Do we have
> any option to disable these features using ./configure options in
> release-3.9 branch or we need to revert all the patches related to the
> feature.
>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > Cc: "Shyam Ranganathan" , "Nithya
On 09/30/2016 03:02 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
In gfapi, we pass down readdirp, irrespective of whether the application
called readdir/readdirp.
Hence the behaviour will be same for samba and Ganesha i suppose.
But in gfapi, I see clear distinction for readdir and readdirp calls
Does samba/gfapi/nfs-ganesha have options to disable readdirp?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> What if the lower xlators want to set the entry->inode to NULL and clear
> the entry->d_stat to force a lookup on the name? i.e.
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Raghavendra G
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Shyam wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2016 04:02 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
>>
>>> W.r.t Samba consuming this, it requires a great deal of code change in
>>>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:09:34PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This an update to the previous mail about Fine graining of the
> > GlusterFS upstream bugzilla components.
> >
> > Finally we
Hi,
Following features are not ready or not planned for 3.9 release. Do we
have any option to disable these features using ./configure options in
release-3.9 branch or we need to revert all the patches related to the
feature.
- dht2
- jbr
Please add if we need to disable/remove any other
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Shyam wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 04:02 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
>
>> W.r.t Samba consuming this, it requires a great deal of code change in
>> Samba.
>> Currently samba has no concept of getting buf from the underlying file
>> system,
>>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:02:41AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Nithya suggested we rename the log files to have the Jenkins Job ID, making
> > it
> > easier to match the log file to the job. I think this is
- Original Message -
> From: "Nigel Babu"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "gluster-infra" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 6:28:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [regression
On 09/29/2016 12:48 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 09/22/2016 07:28 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
The first preview/dev release of GlusterD-2.0 is available now. A
prebuilt binary is available for download from the release-page[1].
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 07:28 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>
>> The first preview/dev release of GlusterD-2.0 is available now. A
>> prebuilt binary is available for download from the release-page[1].
>>
>> This is just a preview of what
On 09/22/2016 07:28 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
The first preview/dev release of GlusterD-2.0 is available now. A
prebuilt binary is available for download from the release-page[1].
This is just a preview of what has been happening in GD2, to give
users a taste of how GD2 is evolving.
GD2 can now
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Muthu Vigneshwaran
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This an update to the previous mail about Fine graining of the
> GlusterFS upstream bugzilla components.
>
> Finally we have come out a new structure that would help in easy
> access of the bug for
40 matches
Mail list logo