Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:44:02PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > How do we get the following tags in the commit message? > > > Smoke: Gluster Build System > > NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System > > CentOS-regression:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] opportunist for outreachy

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Shyam wrote: > On 10/14/2016 10:48 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > >> Hi Soumya, >> >> Welcome to the community. >> >> Here[1] is the link for Gluster Documentation. I would suggest you to >> google and >> read a bit about GlusterFS and

[Gluster-devel] Xavi documented how erasure coding algo works

Your comments are welcome @ http://review.gluster.org/15637 -- Pranith ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

How do we get the following tags in the commit message? > Smoke: Gluster Build System > NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System > CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:14

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] opportunist for outreachy

On 10/14/2016 10:48 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: Hi Soumya, Welcome to the community. Here[1] is the link for Gluster Documentation. I would suggest you to google and read a bit about GlusterFS and then get started with "Quick Start Guide[2]". Once you have done your setup and have played

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Weekly Community Meeting 12 Oct 2016 - Minutes

On 10/13/2016 09:20 AM, Joe Julian wrote: You forgot to count yourself: 6. But still ... 6 when there was 60(?) in Berlin seems light. I know the 4am time doesn't work for the west coast of America, but that only eliminates a very small percentage of those. What's up, everyone else? Can

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] opportunist for outreachy

Hi Soumya, Welcome to the community. Here[1] is the link for Gluster Documentation. I would suggest you to google and read a bit about GlusterFS and then get started with "Quick Start Guide[2]". Once you have done your setup and have played a bit around the installation and configuration move on

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:21:23PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > I've said on this thread before, none of this is easy to do. It needs us to > fork Gerrit to make our own changes. I would argue that depending on the > data from the commit message is folly. Eventhough we all seem to agree that

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

I've said on this thread before, none of this is easy to do. It needs us to fork Gerrit to make our own changes. I would argue that depending on the data from the commit message is folly. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at

[Gluster-devel] Check the possibility to incorporate DEBUG info permanently in build

Hi Team, As we are seeing many issues in gluster. And we are failing to address most of the gluster issues due to lack of information for fault analysis. And for the many issue unfortunately with the initial gluster logs we get a very limited information which is not at all possible to find the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Issue about the size of fstat is less than the really size of the syslog file

Hi, Raghavendra, Our version of GlusterFS is 3.6.9, and I also check the newest code of main branch, the function of " mdc_inode_iatt_set_validate" is almost same, from the following code of this function, We could see a "TODO" comments inline, does it mean if we enhance write-behind feature,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] 'Reviewd-by' tag for commits

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:01:43PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Michael Adam wrote: > > > On 2016-10-05 at 09:45 -0400, Ira Cooper wrote: > > > "Feedback-given-by: " > > > > Niels/Nigel, >Is this easier