Re: [Gluster-devel] Custom Transport layers

On 29/10/2016 12:46 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: In a modern switched network, the savings are only on the sender side; the switch has to copy the packet to N receiver ports anyway. Hmmm, I never considered that side of things. I guess I had a somewhat naive vision of packets floating through the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Custom Transport layers

> Is it possible to write custom transport layers for gluster?, data > transfer, not the management protocols. Pointers to the existing code > and/or docs :) would be helpful Is it *possible*? Yes. Is it easy or well documented? Definitely no. The two transports we have - TCP/UNIX-domain

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS-3.9.0 - Delete or disable experimental features

On 10/28/2016 06:47 AM, Kaushal M wrote: Jeff & Shyam, We need you opinions on this as these are your components. 3.9 is still building and shipping experimental features. The packages being build currently include these. We shouldn't be doing this. I have 2 changes under review [1] & [2],

[Gluster-devel] Custom Transport layers

Is it possible to write custom transport layers for gluster?, data transfer, not the management protocols. Pointers to the existing code and/or docs :) would be helpful I'd like to experiment with broadcast udp to see if its feasible in local networks. It would be amazing if we could write

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS-3.9.0 - Delete or disable experimental features

> We need you opinions on this as these are your components. > > 3.9 is still building and shipping experimental features. The packages > being build currently include these. We shouldn't be doing this. > > I have 2 changes under review [1] & [2], which disable and delete > these respectively. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

I've finished my testing of GlusterD, and everything is working as expected. I'm giving an ACK for GlusterD. I've tested mainly the core of GlusterD and CLI. I've not tested features like snapshots, tier, bit-rot, quota, ganesha etc. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Kaushal M

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-10-28 12:32 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > > No it is not completely valid. We will update it and announce the release > > sometime soon. > > Thank you. > Could you

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

2016-10-28 12:32 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri : > No it is not completely valid. We will update it and announce the release > sometime soon. Thank you. Could you also fix the other roadmaps with certain features and what is being worked on? There is a little bit

[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS-3.9.0 - Delete or disable experimental features

Jeff & Shyam, We need you opinions on this as these are your components. 3.9 is still building and shipping experimental features. The packages being build currently include these. We shouldn't be doing this. I have 2 changes under review [1] & [2], which disable and delete these respectively.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il 25 ott 2016 12:42, "Aravinda" ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > Since Automated test framework for Gluster is in progress, we need help > from Maintainers and developers to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

I'm continuing testing GlusterD for 3.9.0rc2. I wasted a lot of my time earlier this morning testing 3.8.5 because of an oversight. I have one issue till now, the cluster.op-version defaults to 4. This shouldn't be how it's supposed to be. It needs to be set to the 39000 for 3.9.0. I'll send

Re: [Gluster-devel] Input/output error when files in .shard folder are deleted

I did one random read test (~10k shard in one replicate group) but so far no error reported, will try to do few more tests over the weekend to confirm this. Just a quick question, is the full heal process heal in sequence according to sorted file name? Thanks. Cwtan On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

Il 25 ott 2016 12:42, "Aravinda" ha scritto: > > Hi, > > Since Automated test framework for Gluster is in progress, we need help from Maintainers and developers to test the features and bug fixes to release Gluster 3.9. > Is the following roadmap still valid or any changes

Re: [Gluster-devel] Issue about the size of fstat is less than the really size of the syslog file

hi George, It would help if we can identify the bare minimum xlators which are contributing to the issue like Raghavendra was mentioning earlier. We were wondering if it is possible for you to help us in identifying the issue by running the workload on a modified setup? We can suggest

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Test Thursday - Release 3.9

Thanks to "Tirumala Satya Prasad Desala" , we were able to run tests for Plain distribute and didn't see any failures. Ack Plain distribute. - Original Message - > From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" > To: "Aravinda" , "Gluster Devel"