Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

2016-11-10 Thread ABHISHEK PALIWAL
Hi Pranith, Could you please tell tell me the logs showing that the mount is not available to connect to both the bricks. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > As per the logs, the mount is not able to connect to both the bricks. Are > the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Sanoj Unnikrishnan
Pasting Testing Logs == 3.6 [root@dhcp-0-112 rpms]# /sbin/gluster v create v1 $tm1:/export/sdb/br1 volume create: v1: success: please start the volume to access data [root@dhcp-0-112 rpms]# gluster v start v1 [root@dhcp-0-112 rpms]# [root@dhcp-0-112 rpms]# mount -t

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

2016-11-10 Thread ABHISHEK PALIWAL
Hi Rafi KC, I have already attached all the logs in my first mail and I am getting these logs on 25th board. You can find the logs at logs/d/usr/002500_glusterfiles/varlog_glusterfs/brick/ //Abhishek On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > Hi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

2016-11-10 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
Hi Abhishek, Could you please see if you are bricks are healthy or not, may be you can do a gluster volume status or you can look into the logs. If bricks are not running can you please attach the bricks logs in /var/log/gluster/bricks/ . Rafi KC On 11/11/2016 10:20 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

2016-11-10 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On 11-Nov-2016 11:50, "Mohammed Rafi K C" wrote: > > Hi Abhishek, > > Could you please see if you are bricks are healthy or not, may be you can do a gluster volume status or you can look into the logs. If bricks are not running can you please attach the bricks logs in

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Feedback on DHT option "cluster.readdir-optimize"

2016-11-10 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
On 11/10/2016 09:05 PM, Raghavendra G wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Vijay Bellur > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Nithya Balachandran > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] getting "Transport endpoint is not connected" in glusterfs mount log file.

2016-11-10 Thread ABHISHEK PALIWAL
Hi, Its an urgent case. Atleast provide your views on this On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:08 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Hi, > > We could see that sync is getting failed to sync the GlusterFS bricks due > to error trace "Transport endpoint is not connected " > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:44:21AM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam wrote: >> > On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at

Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto Status Update

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
Thank you for the update. It is exciting to see glusto move ahead! I will add an agenda item around populating tests in glusto to next week's maintainers' meeting. Regards, Vijay On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > Shwetha and I have gotten

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Sanoj Unnikrishnan
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Manikandan Selvaganesh < manikandancs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No problem. As you said , glusterd_quota_limit_usage invokes the function > which regenerates the conf file. Though I do not remember exactly, to my > understanding when I tried, it did not work

Re: [Gluster-devel] Restructuring download.gluster.org package directories (WAS: Missing Debian packages)

2016-11-10 Thread Nigel Babu
Short answer: Yes, but not right away. I discussed this with Kaleb at the summit. I'd like to own packaging entirely (and automate it), but once I have more time to do so. My primary concern right now is lack of time. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Shyam
On 11/10/2016 11:56 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:44:21AM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam wrote: On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam wrote:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Niels de Vos
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:13:32PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> I am trying to understand the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Niels de Vos
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:44:21AM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam wrote: > > On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/10/2016

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Shyam wrote: > On 11/10/2016 11:01 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/10/2016 10:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM,

Re: [Gluster-devel] Restructuring download.gluster.org package directories (WAS: Missing Debian packages)

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:05:55PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joe Julian wrote: >> > On 10/18/2016 09:52 AM, Shane StClair wrote: >> > >> > Yes, I'm well aware

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Manikandan Selvaganesh
Raghavendra, No problem. As you said , glusterd_quota_limit_usage invokes the function which regenerates the conf file. Though I do not remember exactly, to my understanding when I tried, it did not work properly in my setup. It is apparently because in the later function where we regenerate the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Shyam wrote: > > > On 11/10/2016 10:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh >> wrote: >>> >>> Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which >>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Shyam
On 11/10/2016 10:21 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf is regenerated to the later version. It works properly. And as Pranith said,

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Feedback on DHT option "cluster.readdir-optimize"

2016-11-10 Thread Raghavendra G
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > > > > > > On 8 November 2016 at 20:21, Kyle Johnson wrote: > >> > >> Hey there, > >> > >> We have a number of

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On 10-Nov-2016 20:52, "Vijay Bellur" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh > wrote: > > Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf > > is regenerated to the later version. It works

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Raghavendra G
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Manikandan Selvaganesh < manikandancs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which > quota.conf is regenerated to the later version. It works properly. And as > Pranith said, both enabling/disabling takes a lot of time

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: > Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf > is regenerated to the later version. It works properly. And as Pranith said, > both enabling/disabling takes a lot of time to

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Manikandan Selvaganesh
Enabling/disabling quota or removing limits are the ways in which quota.conf is regenerated to the later version. It works properly. And as Pranith said, both enabling/disabling takes a lot of time to crawl(though now much faster with enhanced quota enable/disable process) which we cannot suggest

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Raghavendra G
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I am trying to

[Gluster-devel] FSFE pads to github wiki / alternative etherpad - info. required

2016-11-10 Thread Saravanakumar Arumugam
Hi, I am working on moving fsfe pages to github wiki( as discussed in Gluster community meeting, yesterday). Identified the following links present in fsfe etherpad. I need your help to check whether the link(maybe created by you) needs to be moved to github wiki. Also, if any other

[Gluster-devel] Glusto Status Update

2016-11-10 Thread Nigel Babu
Hello folks, Shwetha and I have gotten far enough to get the Glusto tests to pass for Fuse mounts, NFS, and Samba. Well the fix for Samba isn't in yet, but we know what we need to do. Thanks to help from Kaushal, Shyam, Nithya, Jiffin, and Raghavendra Talur. Shwetha is also working on

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches. Raghavendra's >> patch is crucial because gfapi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches. Raghavendra's >> patch is crucial because gfapi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

2016-11-10 Thread Raghavendra Talur
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should affect > small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops. So for > now I think going ahead with the release is best. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Feedback on DHT option "cluster.readdir-optimize"

2016-11-10 Thread Nithya Balachandran
On 8 November 2016 at 20:21, Kyle Johnson wrote: > Hey there, > > We have a number of processes which daily walk our entire directory tree > and perform operations on the found files. > > Pre-gluster, this processes was able to complete within 24 hours of > starting. After