On 16-12-14 07:43:05, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:28:52AM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As we know gluster block storage creation and maintanace is not simple
> > today, as it involves all the manual steps mentioned at [1]
> > To make this basic
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:28:52AM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we know gluster block storage creation and maintanace is not simple
> today, as it involves all the manual steps mentioned at [1]
> To make this basic operations simple we would like to integrate the
> block story
Hi,
As per the discussion, we will have tier as a service in for 3.10 and the rest
of
the work such as add-brick, rebalance support and remove brick will be
continued
in the mainline.
Each will be implemented one after the other.
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Lambright"
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Shyam wrote:
> Prasanna,
>
> When can the design be ready for review? I ask this as feature completion
> for 3.10 is slated around 17th Jan, 2017.
Shyam, I am currently working on libvirt bug in its gluster driver.
Hopefully will wind that
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Shyam wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 12:26 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:20:22PM +0530, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>>
>>> Gluster should have some provision to take statedump of gfapi
>>> applications.
>>>
>>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Ashish Pandey"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Shyam Ranganathan"
> , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Xavier Hernandez"
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Shyam wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 08:06 AM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>
>> During graph switch we do not perform much cleanup operation on the
>> old graph, leading to memory leak.
>>
>> + Inode table of old graph needs cleanup.
>>- Fix inode
hello,
After reading the "nfs" xlator i'm doing some statistics work with
"debug/io-stats" and find that only the open/create/mkdir will do the "
*ios_inode_ctx_set*" means other operations such readv(not created during
the lifetime of this glusterfs process) will not be calculated for the
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ashish Pandey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have been seeing an issue where re balancing symbolic links leads to an
> assertion failure in EC volume.
>
> The root cause of this is that while migrating symbolic links to other sub
> volume, it
On 12/12/2016 11:52 PM, Shyam wrote:
Samikshan,
Request that a spec page be opened for the same, so that reviews and
discussions can happen against that.
Hi. I have opened a related spec page here:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16118/. Reviews and feedback are welcome.
Thanks,
Samikshan
Roll call (hgowtham, 12:00:08)
* agenda: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-bug-triage (hgowtham,
12:00:15)
* Next week’s meeting host (hgowtham, 12:03:10)
* ankitraj to host the bug triage on 20th December (hgowtham,
12:07:25)
* Action items (hgowtham, 12:07:53)
* jiffin
On 12/13/2016 04:30 AM, Anoop C S wrote:
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 11:44 -0500, Shyam wrote:
Anoop,
I have summarily marked this for 3.10, but have a few requests here,
1) Can we open a spec for this?
We do have an accepted design spec under glusterfs-specs namely 'Trash
Improvements'[2] among
Hi all,
The weekly Gluster bug triage is about to take place in one hour.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
( https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
(in your terminal, run: date -d "12:00
Hi,
Below are some of the backported patches that are important for 3.9, please
review the same:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15890/ (afr,dht,ec: Replace
GF_EVENT_CHILD_MODIFIED with event SOME_DESCENDENT_DOWN/UP)
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15933/ , http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15935/
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 11:44 -0500, Shyam wrote:
> Anoop,
>
> I have summarily marked this for 3.10, but have a few requests here,
>
> 1) Can we open a spec for this?
We do have an accepted design spec under glusterfs-specs namely 'Trash
Improvements'[2] among which
this particular proposal is
Hi All,
We have been seeing an issue where re balancing symbolic links leads to an
assertion failure in EC volume.
The root cause of this is that while migrating symbolic links to other sub
volume, it creates a link file (with attributes .T) .
This file is a regular file.
Now,
16 matches
Mail list logo