Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > All, > > Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your > co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur > sent a patch last week [1] capturing all the discussions. > >

[Gluster-devel] Regards to highlight the change in behavior of metadata operation for directory

Hi All, As we know in glusterfs we have one known issue specific to preserve metadata consistency for directory in pure distributed environment. Problem: After brick stop if application do any metadata operation(like permission,uid/gid change, xattr change) on directory and restart

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: netbsd-periodic #98

Netbsd runs don't go through. add-brick-self-heal.t seems to be generating core. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 at 06:20 Subject: [Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: netbsd-periodic #98 To: ,

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:25:23PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:11:29PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:25:23PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:11:29PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was working on subdir mount for fuse clients [1], and was able to

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:11:29PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was working on subdir mount for fuse clients [1], and was able to > handle > > pieces just fine in filesystem part of gluster. [2] > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:11:29PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi, > > I was working on subdir mount for fuse clients [1], and was able to handle > pieces just fine in filesystem part of gluster. [2] > > What is pending is, how will we handle the authentication options for this > at each

[Gluster-devel] What would be ideal option for 'auth.allow' to support subdir mount?

Hi, I was working on subdir mount for fuse clients [1], and was able to handle pieces just fine in filesystem part of gluster. [2] What is pending is, how will we handle the authentication options for this at each subdir level? I propose to keep the current option and extending it to handle new

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-07-20-8a09d780 (master branch)

GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-07-20-8a09d780 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] Error while mounting gluster volume

The following generally means it is not able to connect to any of the glusterds in the cluster. [1970-01-02 10:54:04.420406] E [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1818:mgmt_rpc_notify] 0-glusterfsd-mgmt: failed to connect with remote-host: 128.224.95.140 (Success) [1970-01-02 10:54:04.420422] I [MSGID: 101190]